The world is consuming natural resources faster than they can be renewed. Therefore, it is important that products are made to last. Governments should discourage people from constantly buying more up to date or fashionable products. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
Many people choose to drive by their own car to work, making traffic congestion during rush hour. Governments have imposed an extra tax on the drivers, trying to reduce traffic. However, I consider it a negative development.
First, imposing an extra tax during rush hour cannot reduce people’s willingness to drive to work. Although paying extra money increases the burden of workers, the advantages of driving to work still outweigh that drawback. Commuting by their own car is convenient and comfortable for workers. They can alternate their schedules freely, instead of following the timetables of trains or buses. In addition, they can enjoy their own space before work. Therefore, authorities should optimise public transportation systems and launch promotion projects to attract workers. For instance, authorities can expand the subway systems as well as increase the train frequency. Otherwise, workers will not change their habit.
Furthermore, levying a congestion tax worsens the traffic. Authorities have to check the identity of every driver during the rush hour, in order to impose a tax. Drivers are forced to stop and receive examination. It is a complex work and it takes much time for the police to make sure whether the information is correct or not. Roads would be more congested by the measure. Authorities can uplift the fare of parking and reduce the parking lots in cities. It will be more efficient for making people less willing to drive during rush hour.
To conclude, imposing a congestion tax is neither effective nor efficient for reducing traffic during rush hour. I suggest that governments should try other measures to deal with the problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | mirolinquency | 11 | view |
| 2015-10-20 | manikn10 | 80 | view |
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and g 73
- In some cities, the governments have tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive or negative? 61
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 78
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both t 78
- Some people believe that the country development benefits from the high-educated university students. However, some people think that the large amount of young people in university only leads to high unemployment graduates. Discuss both views and give you 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 2464, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...lass='pwa-mark pwa-mark-done'>whether or not the information is correct. Roads...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, still, therefore, well, for instance, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3849.0 1615.20841683 238% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 9.57462686567 5.12529762239 187% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 11.3525917557 2.80592935109 405% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559701492537 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 1060.2 506.74238477 209% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.6 1.60771543086 162% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 153.727571865 49.4020404114 311% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 167.347826087 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4782608696 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0176131630256 0.244688304435 7% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237379520245 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0278405261788 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0294790075523 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0116801329269 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 32.4 13.0946893788 247% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -30.38 50.2224549098 -60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 21.7 11.3001002004 192% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 37.93 12.4159519038 305% => Coleman_liau_index is high.
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.