The world natural resources are consumed at an ever-increased rate. What
are the dangers of this situation? What should we do?
Accelerating the consumption of natural resources is among the biggest issues facing the world today. This has potential problems which could lead to ecological contamination. In this essay, I shall consider the main threats and try to put forward some possible solutions.
The environment will suffer a major setback when natural resources is increasingly exploited by humans. The consequences may contain a sequence of negative impacts on human’s lives such as water shortages, oil and minerals depletion, loss of forest cover, etc. As of today, approximately one billion people lack access to clean water because of natural water wastage. Likewise, oil and minerals depletion would be devastating because they are essential commodities in manufacturing, planting, mining, and transportation among many activities. Besides, deforestation will inevitably lead to several natural disasters such as soil erosion, increase in the greenhouse gas resulting in global warming, loss of biodiversity, flooding and drought.
The situation calls for prompt actions. First, programs aimed at reducing should be enact to educate people about the importance of conserving natural resources so as to raise awareness of reducing the level of natural resources being misused. The second remedy is to reduce oil, mineral, and material consumption. Manufactures can, for instance, be trained on lean manufacturing (recycling, re-use, and reducing wastage) while consumers sensitized on how to adopt re-use, reducing wastage, and recycling techniques. Third, renewables such as solar and wind power should be explored more and utilized to reduce the dependency on fossil fuel because these alternatives are considered both unlimited and environmental-friendly.
In conclusion, the growing consumption of natural resources in many parts of the world today can cause a range of hazards to the environment and human lives. However, this can be handled by adopting above mentioned suggestions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-06 | Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Dung | 84 | view |
- describe line graph 11
- the table below shows the amount of waste production in 6 different countries over a 20-year period. 56
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ 78
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- describe line graph 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'enacted'?
Suggestion: enacted
...t, programs aimed at reducing should be enact to educate people about the importance ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ortance of conserving natural resources so as to raise awareness of reducing the level o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pting above mentioned suggestions.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, likewise, may, second, so, third, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80136986301 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26156875406 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643835616438 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.7217691352 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.933333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176918150166 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553490328258 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477335322721 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10233877373 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163652663491 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.