You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:
News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do you think influence these decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported?
You should write at least 250 words.
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Editors are commonly stressful to determine the topic which will be published on the press. The shocking news are regularly more favored than the good ones. However, the job of editors is to carefully select which one is suitable for appearing in the news.
There are two conditions to make up their mind when choosing the broadcasted information. First is the character of the information. Usually, humans tend to be attracted to bad news over good ones. For example, readers will unintentionally pay more attention to an earthquake, a storm or a flood in order to survive. Imagine that ignoring the negative news like the oncoming hurricane is very more dangerous than ignoring the positive news like a dog recusing a boy trapped on a tree. Second is reader's curiosity. It is a human nature, hence people are likely to care about other people’s secrets, especially the celerity. As proof, rumors and spoilers of a singer which easily stimulate reader’s interest is frequently printed on the cover.
There is a debate whether they should present more negative news or positive bulletins should be prominant. Even though bad news is appealed more views, it is not always the center of the Earth. It does create some worry and gloomy sensation. So not all people desire to read or watch those unpleasant events. Instead of those mentioned above, happy ones should be concerned to broadcast by the journalists to balance the information for viewers. The nice stories will help people to be less pessimistic and realize that life does not only contain the crimes, the calamities and the terrors. There are still the bright things surrounding us, for instance, the achievements of environmentalists who are trying to keep the greening of our planet or the dedications of the singer, who is being criticized, contributed to the world.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that people appeal to the distressing information is totally the instinct of human beings. Nevertheless, the media team should weigh the pros and cons before reporting the bulletins to make people love each other and enjoy our life more without forgetting being warned by the sad news.
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do 31
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorernations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it theresponsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after theircitizens themselves?You should write at least 2 61
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of thefollowing topic:News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors do 84
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors d 11
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.Present a written argument or case to an educated reader with no specialist knowledge of the following topic:News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers. What factors d 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, still, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1820.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09803921569 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87140396486 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.590117612 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.85 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0592297998653 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0191393393731 0.084324248473 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0213325632573 0.0667982634062 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0362184856198 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159638553919 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.