The issue of how to improve workplace environment has been a heatedly discussed topic in the recent years, and this has turned into a dilemma facing many. Some people claim that all members in a company should be treated equally and given the same days of annual leave while others do not agree. In my opinion, this idea is completely unacceptable despite some potential merits.
Undeniably, there are some benefits of treating everyone equally and making everyone have the same days of holiday. If this company uses this welfare to recruit people, there will definitely be many talents coming to apply for the job. For example, a company which has a great welfare policy is the first choice of many university graduates. However, the benefit mentioned above does not necessarily imply that this egalitarian concept is completely applicable to real situations.
In fact, this employee-friendly policy leads to management challenges and financial loss. For example, if everyone requests their vacation within the same time slot, this will bring about two problems. First, there will be no one to do the work assigned, and the unfinished jobs will increase colleagues’ workload. Second, the company might have difficulty seeking substitutes who are competent for the jobs, thus suffering financial loss.
In addition, unfairness is the result of giving all workers the equal days of holidays. Some lazy people will not work seriously because no matter how hard they work, they will get the same number of vacations, which will be very unfair to those diligent workers. On the contrary, if companies do not carry out this policy, they are reported to gain more benefits. For instance, a German company adopts a strategy in which how many days of holidays an employee can get depends on his or her contributions to their company. According to the local data analysis, the annual revenue of this company is 30% higher than that of the local companies. Apparently, its strategy motivates its employees to show more commitment to a certain extent.
In conclusion, both of the two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that employees should not be given the same number of vacations, as its negative effects outweigh the rest.
- Nowadays in many countries woman have full time jobs therefore it is logical to share household task evenly between man and woman To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 95
- Marriages are bigger and more expensive nowadays than in the past. Why is this the case? Is it a negative or positive development? 67
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 84
- Some people like doing work by hand Others prefer using machines Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
- Today more people are overweight than ever before What in your opinion are the primary causes of this What are the main effects of this epidemic 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1872.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07317073171 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70401772748 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569105691057 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0896294837 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05555555556 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205358066536 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611697876336 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699751683019 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116641332339 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0351000303873 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.