Traffic congestion has become a serious concern on global level in recent years, due to which the argument over living a peaceful life in metropolitan or outskirts has become common in the media. It is disagreed that suggesting masses to live in cities in place of countryside would be the rightful choice to combat surging issue of traffic and transportation. Analyzing both adverse effects on environment owing to overcrowded city area and hurdles to control the rising traffic will prove this.
Firstly, atmosphere of the city would be filled with large amount of toxic gases if numbers of member living in the city keeps rising. This approach would not only causes detrimental effects on the environment, but also it would set an example of destroying the nature deliberately. For instance, as per research carried by Cambridge University, ozone level of Tokyo city has been doubled in numbers in last decade which would cause breathing issues and unhealthy air quality at any point of time in up coming years. Undoubtedly, this situation could have been avoided if migration towards metropolitan had not been appreciated in the first place. Thus, it is obvious why the idea of encouraging people to move in the city area to fix traffic problems is not plausible.
Secondly, authorities might not have complete control to mitigate the traffic and transpiration matter in case people living in suburbs move to metro cities. This would only jeopardize their current system to handle the traffic as authority might have to deal with huge numbers of humans and locations against fix amount of staff. For example, in a recent survey published by BBC, road accidents cases in Manchester city have risen to 50% in last few years, reason being the absence of monitoring and managing traffic facilities in some areas of the city. Unfortunately, this issue cannot be solved until the trend changes. Therefore, it is clear why the idea of motivating masses to live in cities to curb traffic gridlocks cannot be supported.
In summary, it can be said that humans moving to city areas in large numbers would hinder the government's efforts to keep the city green as well as their control over managing traffic. Hence, changing people's mindset to live in a city and not in suburbs or countryside cannot be accorded. It is predicted that people in future will take corrective actions to keep the environment green and they will abide by the law formed by the government to overcome traffic and transportation issues.
- Nowadays more and more researches are being carried out and sponsored by private organizations Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages in such cases 84
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well Do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- Many people believe that criminals should be imprisoned others however say they should do unpaid work that is beneficial for the community Discuss both view and your opinion 78
- Some people say that artists such as painters writers and musicians affect our life more than scientist To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reason for your answer and include relevant example of your own experience 84
- Today children are spending much more time watching TV compared to the past Why do you think this happens Is this a positive or a negative change 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'would' requires base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...ps rising. This approach would not only causes detrimental effects on the environment,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in summary, as well as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 417.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02877697842 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74495394902 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534772182254 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 506.74238477 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.2172925459 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0625 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0625 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21896519569 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792120040399 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594639553784 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139903543686 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211721921722 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.