Both the poor and the rich find the accessibility into university difficult. Do you agree or disagree?
It is said that attending to a university is equally challenging for both wealthy and low-income group. I completely disagree with it because high education is expensive nowadays and scholarship is only available for the limited part of students.
Firstly, universities demand unaffordable annual fees that can be problematic for low-income groups while for prosperous people it is manageable effortlessly. In other words, for young rich adults there is no need to worry about finances and they can focus on preparation for admission. Contrary to them, low-income persons are desperately trying to receive a scholarship, which is demanding excellent marks and outstanding achievements. Somebody probably argue that moneyless persons could take an educational loan, however the idea to start your life from the huge debts is not encouraging to pursue higher education.
Secondly, descendants of wealthy family have advantages over those who grew up in the poor environment. For instance, children from the rich group attend private schools and private tutors in case of problematic subject. This kind of children is well trained in terms of formal education as well as have excellent problem-solving skills. Whiles in contrast, kids from low-income group attend regular schools and have to manage every educational issue by themselves. In addition, due to unhealthy environment they could have low-self-esteem issues and lack of problem-solving skills, which is necessary for such a demanding goal as high education. Thus, it is obvious that they have less possibility to get into a university along with wealthy ones.
In conclusion, I totally disagree with the idea that enrolling in to the university is equally achievable for both income groups.
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this. To what extend do you agree? 84
- More and more people are moving away from an agricultural background to relocate to cities in order to look for work. What will be consequences for this? What solutions can you offer? 61
- Governments prohibit the underage children for getting full time jobs in certain countries Is it good thing or bad thing 77
- Behaviour in schools is getting worse Explain the causes and effects of this problem and suggest some possible solutions 73
- Traffic congestion is becoming a huge problem for many major cities. Discuss the problems and Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce traffic in big cities. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'Somebody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...tanding achievements. Somebody probably argue that moneyless persons could take an ed...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 593, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pursuing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: pursuing
... from the huge debts is not encouraging to pursue higher education. Secondly, descenda...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51851851852 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15124901751 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3070175352 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.615384615 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7692307692 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3076923077 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0960980735504 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391816780496 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422157509847 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784629595517 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0404040856856 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.