Charities and organizations always give special names to particular days such as 'National Children's Day' and 'National Non-smoking Day'. What are the causes of these particular days? How effective are they?
Recently, increasing particular days, such as ‘National women’s Day’ and ‘National Public Transport Day’, named by some non-profit organization, have become the focus of public concern. This essay will place some analyses on factors which induce this condition before presenting the influences of this situation.
The following grounds, in line with my perception and understanding, mainly account for why charitable organizations give the special day’s new names. To start with, the reason why the days own other names, is precisely on the grounds of getting attention of the citizens to commonweal activities. Thanks to setting ‘National Non-smoking Day’, for instance, increasing residences get the details about the hazard and harm of smoking and try to get rid of this bad habit. In the second place, this issue may mainly spring from reducing care and love to vulnerable groups in our society. To be illustrated, the children whose parents are both working, get decreasing love and care from their father and mother. Eventually, an interesting reason may also be partially responsible for this condition, which is the demand of news of the mass media.
Admittedly, some citizens insist that it is not necessary to give days new names for the charitable organizations’ promotion of public welfare. In their points, the charities can take a vast number of measures to achieve their goals, instead of naming a host of days to confuse the masses. However, the fact support that naming special days plays a pivotal role in propagation of charities. As mentioned above, according to a government report in a latest journal, the percentage of smoking population stopped rising and turned into declining slightly after ‘National Non-smoking Day’ setting approximately three decades ago. That is to say, the control of smoking in our nation can be mainly attributed to the propagation of information by this particular day. More specifically, broadcasting programs about the hazard and harm of smoking, the mass media guide the smokers giving up smoking around the non-smoking day every year.
On basis of analysis of reasons and proof of effects, it is sincerely expected that one day in the near future, our society will benefit increasingly from the new-named days for public reasons by charities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-02 | ravishkazi | 83 | view |
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
- On a recent holiday you lost a valuable item. Fortunately, you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost.Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company. In your letterdescribe the item you lostexplain how you lost ittell the insura 61
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- : Throughout the history, people dream to build a perfect society while they haven't agreed how the ideal society would be like. What is the most important element you think to make a perfect society? How do people do to achieve an ideal society？ 84
- University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 453, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ve, according to a government report in a latest journal, the percentage of smoki...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, second, so, for instance, such as, to start with, in the second place, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45355191257 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12368100505 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57650273224 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4233725167 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.066666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47784042015 0.244688304435 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154519216808 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14287671208 0.0667982634062 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296433207391 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12513787308 0.056905535591 220% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.