Children can learn effectively by simply watching television, therefore they should be allowed to do so to regularly at home and at
school.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Owing to the advancement of science and technology, television has emerged as a source of learning. However, some people assert that television watching is the simplest way of effective learning and children should be provided a regular time to do this activity. I strongly disagree with the statement and in my opinion, watching the screens regularly can have a detrimental effect on a child's health and studies.
Firstly, sitting inactive for prolonged hours and gazing at the screens can have an egregious impact on the health of children. In other words, to provide attractive and innovative learning parents often engage their children in watching cartoons or other programs. This results in the lack of physical activity and in turn, juveniles get prone to several health issues such as obesity, muscular strain, and weakening of eyesight. To illustrate, according to a survey conducted by Health Organization in the USA, 20% of children with vision problems are genetically affected and rest 80% are affected by the strain of light emitted from television screens.
Secondly, children are not mature enough to measure the authenticity of programs featured on television, therefore, they might receive un-ethical information which can affect their mind and study. In addition, with this regular practice, children get addicted and even during their exam days they prefer watching programs instead of studying. Consequently, this leads to their low grades in exams. Further, the addiction to this activity not only affects the studies but also has a severe impact on the mind and behavior of children. For example, a psychological study revealed that watching television is the main reason for the increase of short-tempered children in the age group of 5-10 years.
In conclusion, although television is an asset that provides innovative learning, however, its excessive usage can affect the children physically and mentally. Thus, in order to make children more active and responsible, proper restrictions should be imposed on their habit of watching television.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-27 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 84 | view |
- In many countries, people are living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short time and thrown away.What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to? 73
- Today more people are travelling than ever before.Why is this the case?What are the benefits of travelling for the traveller? 67
- Politicians are more responsible for the protection of the environment than individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that THE MAIN PURPOSE of SCHOOL is to turn children to good citizens and workers, rather than benefit them as individuals.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Doctors in many countries believe that people are not getting enough exercise.What might be causing this lack of exercise and what can be done to address the issue? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... eyesight. To illustrate, according to a survey conducted by Health Organization ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44891640867 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9048267061 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585139318885 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9733032645 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.714285714 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0714285714 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4285714286 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217309960496 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726669141315 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677109631492 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140418558236 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616533355951 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.