Children can learn effectively by watching television. Therefore they should be encouraged to watch television regularly at home and at school. To what extent do you agree?
Television nowadays has become more and more popular. An average family can own at least one TV. As a result, diversified programs are consumed everyday by not only adults but also by children. It is undeniable that watching Television brings some certain benefits to the latter. However, I strongly believe kids should not be encouraged to watch TV regularly at home and at school.
Firstly, inappropriate contents may cause harm to children. It is commonly known that many TV shows or channels are designed for a wide range of age. They can be for the old people, teenager, adult, or kid, etc. Let's imagine if our child sees the 18 plus or too violent scenes, he will have trouble with his mind remembering those moments without getting a proper knowledge about them. When growing up, he might tend to be violent-obsessed or worse, copy and apply what he saw into real life, which is totally a different story. On the other way, what is seen as suitable for babies such as cartoon will bring bad effect if being consumed too much because little fact or lesson can be drawn from it. Therefore, the control or selection over TV programs is fundamental for the young generation to grow.
Secondly, spending time with television is a passive way of learning. Kids simply take in whatever shown and barely seek for new things. It is quite a dependent method which later on might easily destroy the child's ability to think and to question. What is more, this study method also deteriorates the reading habit as it promotes listening and watching moving pictures. Consequently, the intelligence and potentials of a child are limited and it is hard for him to pursue higher education.
Finally, there should be combination between watching Tv and other activities to make sure comprehensive growth of our kids. For example, reading books helps to boost imaginary. Doing sport supports physical health and makes us happier. Or experiment undoubtedly brings back the deep understanding of things and phenomena. Last but not least, as simple as communication can also play a vital role in promoting thinking and interpersonal skill of a child. Generally, there are some better useful activities that parents and teachers can leverage for the young's learning journey.
In conclusion, adults had better not encourage children to watch television regularly at home and at school because of unclassified TV show and limitation of thinking and questioning skill. Besides, a smart mix among TV and other activities is the right formula leading to the complete maturation of our offspring.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | natalie0210 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | bhatvishal@ | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-30 | johnmathewg | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...d people, teenager, adult, or kid, etc. Lets imagine if our child sees the 18 plus o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 26, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...education. Finally, there should be combination between watching Tv and other activitie...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 570, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to journey'
Suggestion: to journey
...rs can leverage for the youngs learning journey. In conclusion, adults had better n...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 10.4138276553 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2158.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 428.0 315.596192385 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04205607477 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81683467802 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 269.0 176.041082164 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628504672897 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 16.0721442886 156% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4704953098 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.32 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.12 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29017324372 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668904858976 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989494448756 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165049772103 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10638393964 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.