Several people reckon that getting a tertiary qualification is the key to landing a desirable job in the society as it makes a candidate stand out from the crowd. While others contend that work experience and soft skills are even more crucial. In my opinion, having theoretical knowledge is more consequential when it comes to job-hunting.
There is no doubt that acquiring practice and non-academic skills holds significant value when seeking high-profile job roles. To begin with, numerous occupations value experience that the formal education does not explicitly provide. Jobs such as sales, marketing and advertising may favor a tactful talker. Therefore, having an impressive resume filled with various achievements will a strong suit. Furthermore, another rationale behind preferring experienced professionals is that such employees will require less time and effort to familiarize with the type of work they are responsible for. In comparison, not only do freshers who receive several weeks' or in-service training frequently make a mistake when fulfilling their duties but they also cost a company extravagant money involved in training.
Notwithstanding, simply attaining hands-on skills without academic knowledge is also an unsuitable trait. Jobs have become more intricate these days, and they cannot be performed without proper knowledge and training. It is also a well-known fact that most high paying work are exclusively available to only highly educated individuals. Being IT staff, for example, can be a gravy train as their average salary is 10-25 million VND per month, which is abundant for them to depend on for their livelihood. Moreover, it is a presently every organization demands a well-educated candidate, even for entry-level positions. The first impression recruiters have of candidates is greatly influenced by a person’s CV, which mainly comprises a person’s qualifications. Consequently, students tend to take on several certificate courses whilst pursuing a university education to help gain an edge over other candidates.
In conclusion, I would like to say that having a decent education and relevant practical competency are both equally vital for securing lucrative employment. However, a person’s capabilities is indeed more indicative of experiential learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'staffs'?
Suggestion: staffs
...y highly educated individuals. Being IT staff, for example, can be a gravy train as t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6936416185 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2138416433 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676300578035 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0730292406 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.444444444 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189024095859 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524221694593 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437749752406 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113073488992 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595850539753 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.