The technology has undoubtedly played a significant role in every walk of life. The development has brought change in the education as well. There is a growing trend of students taking recourse to electronics media for the purposes of studying. However, it has sparked a debate over the computer replacing the teacher for education. There are few who assert with the views whilst some think in the other direction.
Firstly, the technological advancement has indeed penetrated deep in our lives. The process of learning has undergone tremendous change which has benefitted the pupils and overhauled their learning process. However, there are different students and varied level of understanding. As such, it is not feasible for a machine to cater to their respective needs. For instance, A Japanese Company has created a Robot for teaching English to young children. It was observed that the robot cannot outperform the physical presence of a teacher in a class room. Thus, there are certain aspects of humans which a machine cannot reproduce.
Secondly, there are instances when there are emotional needs which are to be borne in mind. There is a sense of feeling of having physical presence of teacher in classroom and can readily solve the issues encountered by one and in case it is difficult to understand, the learning process can be modified. The same will not be the case with an artificial teacher as they are bound to follow certain algorithm. Therefore, with a fixed path it will not be easy to outperform the human connection.
In conclusion, in my opinion, I feel that it will be a very daunting task to replace the human presence with a machine as there will be a sense of longing in the classroom with no connection of mind. In addition, the technological advancement may have skyrocketed but the creator cannot be replaced by the creation itself. In the near future as well, the roles cannot be reversed.
- You have recently moved to a different house.Write a letter to an English-speaking friend. In your letter•Explain why you have moved•Describe the new house•Invite your friend to come and visit 70
- Some people think that having a set retirement age (e.g. 65 years) for everybody, regardless of occupation, is unfair. They believe that certain workers deserve to retire and receive a pension at an earlier age. 56
- Your neighbours have recently written to you to complain about the noise from your flat.Write a letter to your neighbour. In your letter▪explain the reason for the noise▪apologise▪describe what action you will takeWrite at least 150 words. You do NO 70
- Writing Task 1 (a letter)Write a letter to your neighbor to say goodbye, as you decided to leave the area and move to a new home. In your letter say– Explain why you are moving.– What will you miss the most?– Invite him/her to your new home. 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Businesses should do anything they can to make a profit. Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ilst some think in the other direction. Firstly, the technological advancement h...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 324, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...not be replaced by the creation itself. In the near future as well, the roles cann...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98142414861 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86040635031 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520123839009 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2119040822 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6842105263 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280011147504 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071593762317 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683652288269 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160522203823 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762416929319 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.