Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? Discuss both sides.
It is widely agreed that globalization of products are enormously seen in many nations these days. As many individuals around the world start having the same products’ interest. However, the question of whether such a new trend has a positive or negative impact is arguably the most debatable matter. This essay aims to discuss both views in further detail.
To begin with, it is largely believed that product globalization might add a good value for the consumers and even the worldwide market too. First of all, it enhances the business of the international markets which reflects positively on the consumers. Since, it is often expanded the customers’ options by offering multinational items. As a result, this might increase the competition between the local and international companies and lead to improve the quality as well as reduce the price. Syria as an example is considered as a closed market as there are no other international items competing there. Thus, the quality of items might be very low and limited and the price is very high due to the lack of product variations.
On the other hand, it is also argued that product globalization has negative effects on people and their communities. Firstly, it might erase the identity of certain tradition. To illustrate, what is acceptable in New York city might be extremely irritated in Riyadh city. Take the fashion style as an example. In western nations, women have no obligation to put on a short skirt, while it is exceedingly prohibited in most of the Arab nations due to their cultures and faith. Therefore, wearing such a western fashion style will definitely impact on their tradition.
To sum up, it is agreed that most of the people around the world have the same product interest due to the globalization. However, it is sometimes might consider as a fortune since it develops the international market but at the same time it is erase the identity of many people.
- If we want to save the future of the planet we will have to drastically change our way of life What is your opinion 69
- It is thought by some that it’s better to live in a city while others believe that life is better in the countryside 84
- You have received a bill from a mobile phone company for international call charges relating to a time when you did not use your phone for international call. Write a letter to companyComplaining about thisGiving your reasonsAsking for bill to be changed 56
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- All over the world, societies are facing a growing problem with obesity. This problem affects both children and adults.What are the reasons for this rise in obesity,How could it be tackled? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
... same products' interest. However, the question of whether such a new trend has a positive or nega...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 246, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'erased'.
Suggestion: erased
...ional market but at the same time it is erase the identity of many people.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as a result, as well as, first of all, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01840490798 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9262710427 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539877300613 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4705993888 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8888888889 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130792193527 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397678845933 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442052860142 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893963995718 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525643875537 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.