Creative artists should always be given the freedom to express their own idea's (in words, pictures, music or film) in whichever way they wish. There should be no government restrictions on what they do.
Nowadays, there has been a debate the creative artists should be given complete freedom to express their views in music, film, words and pictures. Also, that the government should not interfere in their matter and give them complete freedom. I tend to disagree with this fact based on following reasons.
Firstly, the excess liberty can cause the society negatively and one cannot be allowed to do so. Obviously, government should describe the principles, guidelines and method for the artists to represent their creative work to the public. For instance, if we consider the example of Pakistan’s print and electronic media owned by individuals. It can be witnessed that in the last decade or so, the government had not been involved or monitoring the affairs of media and gave them complete sovereignty. Resultantly, the culture of breaking news had emerged and threatening, horrifying and terrifying news have been watched by millions of people due to the race of ratings of media. Ultimately, people are suffering from anxiety and depression. Moreover, recent survey’s and reports of medical board of Pakistan are evident of the fact.
Secondly, if we delve in entertainment stuff, it could be witnessed that now a day’s mostly movies are based on fiction and animation and they are far away from reality. Furthermore, the young generation usually follows the stuff and tries to behave like the same. For example, a recent action and thriller movie “Fast and the Furious 8” has been released in Pakistan. It entails ridiculous movement of cars in a hasty manner to chase the antagonist. As a result, youth in Pakistan having cars tend to follow the same and numbers of car accidents have been increased.
In summation, I would like to reiterate my opinion based on the fact discussed supra. Nevertheless, government should define boundaries for artists to express the views as these should not end up in a destructing way for public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-05 | coolchris2100 | 84 | view |
| 2017-07-16 | aatif imtiaz | 78 | view |
| 2017-07-16 | aatif imtiaz | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punish 67
- Are famous people treated unfairly by media Should they be given more privacy or it is the price of their fame an invasion into their private lives 75
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 73
- Being a celebrity such as famous film star or sports personality brings problems as well as benefit. Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 84
- Write a letter to your new employer asking him for extension in date of joining.You should write1. why you are writing?2. what are the reasons for delay?3. How long will it take to join ?Start the letter withDear...... 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 424, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a hasty manner" with adverb for "hasty"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... It entails ridiculous movement of cars in a hasty manner to chase the antagonist. As a result, y...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1656.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19122257053 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88801004133 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2312184621 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4117647059 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23529411765 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27470436318 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745348795847 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0983043847671 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167690611153 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0916916523102 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.