Cycling is more environment friendly than other forms of transport. Why it is not popular in many places? How can its popular be increased?
Cycling is a perfect exercise which enables people to be super fit and it also decrease the usage of other fuelled vehicles to a great extent. Additionally, it is considered to be the optimum solution to safeguard our environment from air pollution. However, some countries are not using this medium of transport for various reasons. In the following passage, I will explain the factors why it is not familiarised among nations and measures to improve its usage.
Do some nations have a separate cycle path? No. People are hesitant to drive cycle due to unavailability of dedicated path. Most of them have a fear that they might indulge with accident while driving in congested roads. There is a sense of insecurity spread among locals that driving cycle is unsafe. For instance, in India, as statistics say, more children are being injured while driving cycles to their schools. Moreover, parking in cities is another obstacle where people have to spend more money even though it is unsecured. Furthermore, the increasing prices of bicycles are affordable to middles class people. Therefore, the above are the various causes for its unpopularity in some countries.
When the government reduce the tax rate on bicycles, more youngsters will be interested to buy them and this will prevent them from obese. For example, in corporate companies they are providing cycles at discounted rates to their employees. Hence this enables them to use it for their commutation. Planning cities and towns with cycle path is an extremely intricate process, but that administration department should include this facility to their plan. Thus, it is believed, affordable pricing and sufficient parking amenities will foster people to use cycles for their commutation.
To sum up, as the proverb says, “prevention is better than cure”. Youngsters should incubate the use of cycles as an integral part of their life, which will have avenue of benefit to their appearance as wells as for the environment too.
- There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music?Is the traditional music of a country more important than the International music that is heard everywhere nowadays?Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support y 67
- Some people argue that it is more important to have an enjoyable job than to earn lot of money, others disagree and think that a good salary leads to a better life. Discuss both the views and give you own opinion. 89
- Cycling is more environment friendly than other forms of transport. Why it is not popular in many places? How can its popular be increased? 78
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their level of health and fitness is decreasing. What are the causes and measure to overcome this trend. 84
- Some people believe school children should be given multiple short vacations while others believe they should get one long vacation. Give advantage for both and your point of view. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreases'?
Suggestion: decreases
...bles people to be super fit and it also decrease the usage of other fuelled vehicles to ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...at discounted rates to their employees. Hence this enables them to use it for their c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as for, for example, for instance, to sum up, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18518518519 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85322771578 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6778110525 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4210526316 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0526315789 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94736842105 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14565588522 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435741270365 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0246015693059 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903977369005 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358368268396 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.