In developing countries, tourism can have negative effects on their local environment and culture, so it should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is an opinion asserting that visiting places in undeveloped countries may account for poor effects on their environment and culture. I, however, disagree with the given statement on the basis of some compelling reasons.
To begin with, by flocking tourists to these destinations from various nations, the indigenous people are bound to get familiar with other cultures. This is, the more holiday-makers visit these countries, the more native members put effort to raise their standards to live up to the tourists’ expectations. Take some developing countries which have been craving travellers’ attention for the past few years as an example; they have fostered their own culture and social conventions by being exposed to a variety of people’s behavior. This, in turn, alters the means of local citizens’ acting in society, as they are more in touch with foreigners.
In addition, another compelling argument against such a notion is that with some specific provisions made by the local government, no harm will be done to the host country's environment. That is to say, places of interest for several vacationers, these tourist sights, visited by many, can generate revenue for local communities. A good illustration of this is European countries which are said to be the final destination of the majority of worldwide sightseers. It is widely believed that if they had not been so welcoming and attentive to the visitors, they would not be among the industrial countries; since tourism is deemed as one of the most profitable industries known to us.
In conclusion, I, for one, advocate the idea of embracing more tourists and providing them with ample facilities. In this case, not only would they be detrimental to the local nature and culture, but they bring revenue which attributes to economic prosperity.
- In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians were observed in the park and the numbers of each species were drasti 58
- In some countries many people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past Do you think this is a positive or negative development 84
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workforce Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 89
- Write a letter to your neighbor who is having animals in his her garden You and your family members are having problems with the animals 1 introduce yourself 2 tell the problem 3 suggest solutions Begin your letter as follows Dear 73
- An increasing number of people are choosing plastic surgery Why do people choose to change the way they look Do you think it is a positive or negative development 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23129251701 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95070330717 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625850340136 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5606541696 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.166666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245247743046 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821454801505 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344452693397 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142200226355 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037508372776 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.