Do you agree or disagree that the world was a better place decades ago that it is today? Why do you think so? Give specific details and examples to support your answer.
There is a stark difference in the present world and the world few decades ago. There is an argument that despite the advancements in technology, the planet was more happier and cleaner place for living beings than today, I agree to this statement. In this essay I will discuss the changing human values and impact of pollution along with relevant examples to support my view.
There is ample evidence indicating that pollution is a pressing concern for the planet earth resulting in loss of countless lives. The primary reason for this is rapid industrialization. In the late 1930’s there was a major ramp up in the production of goods with the advent of electricity coupled with growing population and rising demand. This led to inception of many factories across the world amidst residential areas resulting in pollution of clean water and fresh air, a root cause for many respiratory and log term ailments such as typhoid. To illustrate this, a report from the WCC committee state that there was a 200% increase of the co2 levels in atmosphere in the past 2 decades which has implied a 33% rise in patients suffering from lung related diseases. Therefore it is conclusively clear that the modern polluted world is unsafe to even breathe with many related problems looming over.
Furthermore, the older generations had always prioritized human values and traditions over riches creating a strong foundation for a society to flourish. In this fast paced world, it is a rarity to find such individuals. This create rifts in relationships of the households and also leads to corruption in the community. To cite an example, the average marriage life of a couple is currently standing at 5 years underlining the regard for the institution by people in modern day leading to more children in destitute homes and lonely adults Thus it is possible to state that better morals and ethics can pave way for brighter future for coming generations.
To sum up, I believe that although technology has made our lives easier, I would say the past world was indeed a cut above present in upholding the values and living a cleaner life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-22 | ghostwriter | 84 | view |
- Some people think it is more beneficial to play sports that are played in teams e g football However others think it is more beneficial individual sports e g tennis and swimming Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- In some countries police officers do not carry guns How does this affect the manner they implement law and order Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of having a gun Provide specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 84
- Television dominates the free time of too many people It can make people lazy and prevent them from socialising with others Do you agree or disagree 89
- The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skill To what extent you agree or disagree 89
- Question some people think making more money is being happier What do you think Can money buy happiness 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'happier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: happier
...ancements in technology, the planet was more happier and cleaner place for living beings tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 772, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s suffering from lung related diseases. Therefore it is conclusively clear that the moder...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the average marriage life of a couple is currently standing at 5 years underlinin...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92222222222 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78287864993 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.2928640382 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.571428571 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0981963404447 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355550761843 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410415208144 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675134729608 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576684471481 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.