Do you think consumers should avoid purchase of over packaged products or is it the responsibility of produces to avoid extra packaging of products.
Give your views with any relevant examples of your own experience.
In modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people on whether sellers should own the responsibility of reducing over packaging or should the buyers reject such products. This essay agrees that the product owners must be accountable for their actions on producing heavily packed items. This essay will firstly discuss on reasons for over packaging and then explains how it can be reduced.
The primary reason for superfluous packaging is to reduce the inconvenience to customers and increase brand marketing. For instance, a kids meal in McDonald's outlet serves a bag of chips, a fully covered burger, a can of drink with a lid and straw and finally a toy in a plastic bag. This kind of packaging clearly explains how McDonald products come with over packing. All these products will have their brand name printed on packaging and customers can easily carry their products with them. By doing so, the product owners are gaining exceptional customer satisfaction along with a power marketing.
Government should step up to reduce this heaving packaging by imposing penalties on product owners. Companies must be made aware that no such ostentatious packaging is required for any product if it is quality enough to meet customer needs. Being government is paramount, it can easily enforce organizations to reduce over packaging by bringing them under the lawsuit if found guilty. For example, a research conducted by the University of Melbourne last year found that the companies are using extra packaging as there are no regulations defined.
In conclusion, product owners and government must work hand-in-hand fashion to reduce superfluous brand packaging for their products.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-14 | ravishkazi | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-13 | Anil_PTE | 78 | view |
- There are social, medical, and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. Do you think that the problems of mobile phones outweigh the benefits? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from observations or your own experi 77
- Do Governments have a legitimate role in protecting citizens from the harmful effects of their own decisions to smoke or are such decisions up to an individual? 85
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss? 77
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage. What problems will it cause? 80
- Recycling our waste is a big issue today. A lot of people feel that others are not recycling enough and that the government should make it a legal requirement. In your opinion, should laws be needed to ensure that people recycle their waste? 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
...crease brand marketing. For instance, a kids meal in McDonalds outlet serves a bag o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29739776952 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82764526211 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565055762082 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1365165883 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.615384615 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230444607761 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916261013889 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420623436802 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144458285958 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302032190632 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.