Skill learning at an early age plays an inevitable role in the progression of a child. Although, reading has been considered to be effective in acquiring skills, other activities can be far more beneficial. I am a strong advocate of this approach and will discuss the reasons behind this along with the relevant examples before coming to a conclusion.
The one key reason of this approach is that playing fun games helps in skill development of youngsters wherein they learn analytical skills better as compared to reading which is an arduous task for them since most preschoolers are reluctant readers. For instance, a recent study by the Hindustan Times showed significant improvement in the proportion of preschoolers in acquiring skills through educational games and playthings than reading books. Furthermore,exposure to fun activities related to drawing and paintings enhances the creativity and thinking ability of a child where they use their logical thinking and imaginative power which in turn would be beneficial in future perspective of life.
In an addendum to this, being active in playing games which are collaborative in nature assist them in gaining skills and confidence. Most importantly , games performed in groups tend to imbibe team building skills in a child which can be applicable in the upcoming years of life. To cite an example, a survey demonstrated the improving efficiency of children who played games in a group at an early age are better at performing outdoor sports involving coordination and teamwork in school competitions.
To conclude, reading should be incorporated in developing kids only if they are interested but preference should be given to other activities that are tempted by youngsters.
- We can see more disasters and violence shown on TV What are its causes and what effects will they exert on the individual and the society 78
- in many countries recently young single people have been living far from their parents from the time they begin studies or work and until they married Do you think there are more advantages of this trend 67
- Children over 15 years should be allowed to take their own decision without any interference from Their parents Do you agree or disagree 91
- Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities.To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view. 56
- You work for an international company and would like to spend six months working in its head office in another country.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter• explain why you want to work in the company’s head office for six months.• Say how 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers are reluctant readers. For instance, a recent study by the Hindustan Times sh...
^^
Line 3, column 462, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , exposure
...aythings than reading books. Furthermore,exposure to fun activities related to drawing an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... skills and confidence. Most importantly , games performed in groups tend to im...
^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntly , games performed in groups tend to imbibe team building skills in a child w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35272727273 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14681370007 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603636363636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.5690208983 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.2 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18583392116 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0745842681398 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236970038657 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108862271926 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042667228678 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.