Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job To what extent do you agree or disagree

Though qualifications and experience should be prioritize while selecting one as an employee, but I believe that, personal qualities are also needed to observe because the insight and personality of a person is important. If a person has good academic prospect without a good personality, the employer could not be able to trust on him. But a person with attractive characteristics can work with the ethics he or she has in her personality.
At first, highly qualified and experienced employee can assert many benefits to the employer. He or she can utilize his or her merit and experience to improvise the company. Such as, an experienced employee can easily cope with the clients and bring the clients from other offices where he or she had worked before. These will obviously help the employer to develop his business. Moreover, experienced employee can leave or get any job at once. So the job provider Has to be much conscious about their own treatment with that specific employee.
On the other hand, the employee with comparatively lesser qualification and experience, work hard to create good reputation about himself. When a person is ethical he or she can never cheat any company. He gives his best to give benefit to the company. For instance, if any employer has trustworthy employers, they can rely on them. Furthermore, they can focus on the development of the company rather than monitoring on the employee.
I strongly opine that, personal qualities are more important despite of paper based qualifications because the certificates may change over time and opportunities or can be faked but the inner personality is the thing which remains the same and original.
To sum up, it can be said that the providers of different occupations should give more importance to the inner qualities of a candidate over the piece of paper which contains the degree and experience while selecting them for their company.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (3 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prioritized'?
Suggestion: prioritized
...qualifications and experience should be prioritize while selecting one as an employee but ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... ethics he or she has in her personality At first highly qualified and experience...
^^^
Line 5, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e while selecting them for their company
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, as to, for instance, such as, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98742138365 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88933309228 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512578616352 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 318.0 20.2975951904 1567% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1586.0 106.682146367 1487% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 318.0 20.7667163134 1531% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 119.0 7.06120827912 1685% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198603135581 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198603135581 0.084324248473 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121340051531 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400994497937 0.056905535591 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 161.1 13.0946893788 1230% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -251.29 50.2224549098 -500% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 127.3 11.3001002004 1127% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.14 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 22.59 8.58950901804 263% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 58.0 9.78957915832 592% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 129.2 10.1190380762 1277% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 58.0 10.7795591182 538% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.