Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both views and give your

Essay topics:

Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There is a common trend of employers requesting for personal details like pastime interests, marital status, etc. This is often debatable as few people are of the opinion that such data is relevant, however we also have set of people not in favor of this. In this essay, I will brief the pros and cons of both views and share my personal thought.

Companies intend to gather such personal details for a particular requirement. For example, few companies like Nestle, Adidas sponsor the spouses, medical insurance, and children’s education. These details are often used to consolidate and provision the expenses. There are also companies that go the extra mile and offer certain incentives based on the employees hobbies or interests. In such cases this is often a good initiative and the employee should not have any issues sharing the same.

In some cases, we have also noticed that the personal details provided in some occasion backfired on the employee. For example, a marital status as divorced might raise questions in some countries. These instances bring about a hold back nature in the employee to share personal information to the company’s database.

Therefore to conclude, I personally support showing all relevant details to the employers as I consider workplace my second home; where I spend most of the hours in a day.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-09-27 balaprasant08 73 view
2018-04-03 Deepthy Williams 61 view
2018-04-03 Deepthy Williams 56 view
Essays by user Deepthy Williams :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...tion to the company's database. Therefore to conclude, I personally support showi...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, so, therefore, for example, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 1615.20841683 70% => OK
No of words: 221.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13122171946 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78975331014 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 361.8 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0866664616 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.5 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223573997707 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772383947172 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420908072055 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129617409523 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635504214478 0.056905535591 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.