The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads.
Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the last century, our world has changed dramatically. Urbanization, prompt technologies advancement, industrialization, and welfare growth led to an overwhelming number of cars on the streets of every city. It’s now the time to try to amend the situation, and I can’t agree more that we really need it. Still, I would consider not only switching to alternative transport and enforcing the control, but also other ways to improve the situation, which I would describe in my essay.
First of all, I would like to explain the reason for my negative attitude to the abundance of cars in our world. The biggest issue is that vehicles cause enormous harm to the environment. For example, the gas emitted by vehicles has a significant impact on the global warming effect. The problem with the utilization of old vehicles exemplifies another negative consequence for the global environment. And, moreover, many people get injuries and even die in car accidents.
Considering all these reasons, I strongly support the idea of promoting the system of public transportation, with a focus not only on ecologically and economically efficient technologies but also on safety as well as comfort. For example, the buses working on solar batteries already introduced in my city, with air conditioning, free wi-fi and USB ports. Also, the mobile application developed to obtain all the needed information on the route and timetable, which should really attract passengers and make public transport more appealing versus car driving.
Another action should be regulation of cars technical condition, which would not only help to control gas emission, but also improve the safety situation on the roads. For instance, the taxes could vary depending on the ecological class of the car. Or, as some European countries practice, access to the city center is prohibited for cars with low standards of emission. These solutions would help to control the emission level and stimulate drivers to use public transport more frequently.
The third intervention, which I personally really like, but this is the top of a pyramid, rather than the fixing the base, is proper planning of cities structure. At the moment the majority of cities have downtown, or city where the majority of offices are located, while the workforce lives in suburbs and quiet areas in the outskirts of the city. Such planning requires people to spend hours weekly to get from home to work and backward, using cars or public transport. In an ideal city, which is built for people, not for cars, I would imagine more cozy planning with short work-home distance, and all the infrastructure objects located nearby.
To summarize, I’d like to say that the humankind is faced with significant challenges, and we need to undergo this transitional period for a better future.
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 there may be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads.Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged and international laws introduced to control car ownership and use.To what e 78
- All children should learn to speak a foreign language as soon as they start school. How far do you agree with this proposal? How important is it for a child to learn a foreign language? 84
- Some students have rented the apartment next to yours. Their parties are upsetting you, your family and other tenants. 78
- In many countries, old or traditional languages are dying out or being forgotten, especially be younger people, is this an acceptable development which occurs inevitably, or is it something which we shohuld try to prevent? 78
- In the future, it may be scientifically possible for people to live for 150 years. This could be good for individuals but it may have negative consequences for society.What are the benefits and risks of people living to 150? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'technologies'' or 'technology's'?
Suggestion: technologies'; technology's
...nged dramatically. Urbanization, prompt technologies advancement, industrialization, and wel...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, really, so, still, third, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2381.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 459.0 315.596192385 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18736383442 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94172511626 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 176.041082164 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566448801743 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 506.74238477 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 0.809619238477 988% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7451336363 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.380952381 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.80952380952 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136106741118 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408206011819 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039615888546 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667368054539 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502735866163 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 78.4519038076 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.