Forests are the lungs of the Earth. Destruction of the world's forests amount to death of the world, we currently know. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a universal fact that trees & plants are the most important things to have on earth. In the early ages, more than 50% of the earth was covered with deuse forest due to which there were very less harm & destruction to the environment.
As the world is progressing the amount of forest area is reducing. Due to the increasing population day by day, the government or the common people are cutting down the natural vegetation of the earth to build accommodations for human beings. People are also using woods from the forests for their businesses purpose. Forests are said to be the lungs of the earth. If they are removed, then definitely there will be breathing problems & other environmental issues, which will lead to a major cause of t he worlds destruction going forward.
In my city, there was a natural forest area which was quite big in size but due to the rapidly increasing need of the land area for construction houses & road ways it was cut down. Today, instead of that deuse jungle, there is only small children's park. I myself have witnessed the destruction due to the refurbishment of the forest. Almost half a decade later, there was a major earthquake & soil erosion in that area. Due to which, thousands of people lost their lives. The tremor of the earthquake was so terrible that most of the skyscrapers built in that region had collapsed leading to a huge loss of life & money.
I believe that the natural vegetation of the earth should be preserved, if not completely, then at least some of them should be. This will help the mankind & the other species living on this earth. Human beings are not the only ones who will be affected but also there are other species who are getting scarce in the world due to the cutting down of the forest areas. The forests as well as the other species living in them are very important to humankind thus, we should make valuable efforts to help preserve our nature.
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future. Others, by contrast, are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 89
- New stories on TV and in newspaper are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinions about this ? 61
- In many places, new homes are needed, but the only space available for building them is in the countryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. 61
- New stories on TV and in newspaper are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words.What is your opinions about this ? 61
- The threat of nuclear weapons maintains world peace. Nuclear power provides cheapand clean energy.The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rm & destruction to the environment. As the world is progressing the amount of ...
^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: big
...s a natural forest area which was quite big in size but due to the rapidly increasing need ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, thus, well, at least, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6568914956 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52499723664 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521994134897 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1371407131 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4117647059 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.35294117647 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191689754362 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072841785993 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788443770416 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121728185394 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060483910334 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 50.2224549098 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.4159519038 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.