Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world However people are being encouraged to use alternative energy sources such as wind energy solar energy and so on Do you think this is a positive or negative development Why

Essay topics:

Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world. However, people are being encouraged to use alternative energy sources such as wind energy, solar energy, and so on. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? Why?

These days there is a greater emphasis on switching to renewable sources of energy like solar and wind. In my opinion, this is a positive development because these sources never get exhausted. Also, they do not pollute air or water unlike conventional sources like fossil fuels.

Fossil fuels are non-renewable. That means they cannot be replenished. The truth is that we have already consumed much of the fossil fuel available to this and if we continue to consume it at the current rate, we may run out of its supply in a few decades. Should this happen, every aspect of our life will come to a standstill. Obviously, there is an urgent need to switch to alternative sources that can be renewed. Another downside of our dependence on fossil fuels is that they emit harmful gases that contribute to global warming. Sea levels have already started rising and many coastal towns now face the risk of getting submerged. Limiting the use of conventional energy sources is the most effective way to reverse this trend. On the other hand, alternative sources like wind or solar are clean and green. They do not pollute air. Also, they are inexhaustible sources. By simply switching to solar or wind energy, we can improve air quality to a great extent. We can also eliminate the risk of running out of energy. Of course, harnessing solar or wind energy requires a higher initial capital but they are highly cost effective in the long run.

To conclude, switching to alternative sources of energy is a positive development because they are eco-friendly and available in abundance.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-03-04 sumu 56 view
2020-03-26 vadhrahvirk 78 view
Essays by user sumu :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, of course, in my opinion, on the other hand, to a great extent

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89925373134 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71427205304 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555970149254 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9543335 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.9444444444 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8888888889 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307987155542 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093825412057 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080822221608 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244910660283 0.151304729494 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184370155181 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.