The gap between the rich and the poor is increasingly wide, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address the problems?
The ever-growing gap between the well-off and the deprived has received innumerable attention over the last few decades as this burning issue has given rise to unresolved matters. However, there are several viable methods to consider when dealing with this situation.
There are a few problems arising when it comes to the gap-stretching surge between these 2 types of people in society. First and foremost, it can be seen that social inequality may come into being due to the huge gap. There are a great deal of cases in which children, whose parents can afford better living standard and studying condition, express their bad behaviour towards the less wealthier ones just because of their inferior backgrounds. This leads to the lack of confidence among poorer children and the feeling of anxiety and depression when stepping into schools. Furthermore, it is inevitable that the rate of crime would definitely accelerate as a matter of fact. The reason of it lies in the fact that some people may commit crimes when they are unable to earn enough for their living. As a result, national security will have to put more burden on governments and local authorities in dealing with those offenders.
However, some optimized methods can be utilized with a view to restricting this matter. Firstly, it is of pivotal importance for governments and relevant agencies to introduce new policies which provide assistance to impoverished individuals. To be more specific, not only should tax be reduced on people with modest average income but local authorities also encourage the private businesses to join hands in financial assistance to help the families with less well-off backgrounds. In addition, enhancing economic development particularly in remote areas and the regions in which people are suffering natural disasters on a regular basis should be prioritized.
To conclude, it is clear that gap-related problems between the poor and the rich is soaring and triggering unwanted consequences; however, those matters may need more time and money to be tackled with suggested methods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-12 | frankovidaxt | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 236, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
... due to the huge gap. There are a great deal of cases in which children, whose paren...
^^^^
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...hich children, whose parents can afford better living standard and studying condition,...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 381, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less wealthy'?
Suggestion: less wealthy
...express their bad behaviour towards the less wealthier ones just because of their inferior bac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...-off backgrounds. In addition, enhancing economic development particularly in rem...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, in addition, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1754.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26726726727 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85131932863 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606606606607 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6030974288 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.285714286 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7857142857 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147205213799 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471412448552 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053775261641 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0954337015365 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429997231823 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.