- It is completely evident that governments allocate parts of their annual budget for both public services and art fields. Although there is an assertion that the devoting the budget to the arts is squandering money, I am inclined to the belief that both categories are equally considerable.
- To begin with, nation-wide convenient life is the most rational justification for the importance of public services. That is to say, officials should take the preparation some necessities of life such as the public transport and medical services into consideration. Simply put, by growth of the population the requisition of more convenient communication systems can be more tangible. As well as this, governments have to enhance public health by increasing and equipping health care centres. Obviously, negligence in their performance of such these services can be followed by irreversible damages.
- However, taking art into consideration is equally important. Having said that, beside the daily activities existence of artistic centres such as movie theatres and concert halls is necessary. That is, there are a pile of scientific evidences suggested that performance of such these programs can improve the society mental health significantly. This is in addition to people’s demanding to amusement places. To put it differently, it is all-pervasive these days that people spend a majority part of their leisure time for artistic programs.
- As a result, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that governments should pay attention to art activities by setting up a fund as well as public services.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: apurwar
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...budget to the arts is squandering money, I am inclined to the belief that both ca...
^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'activities'' or 'activity's'?
Suggestion: activities'; activity's
...ant. Having said that, beside the daily activities existence of artistic centres such as m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...there are a pile of scientific evidences suggested that performance of such these...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47637795276 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1830579733 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582677165354 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.091602584 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5384615385 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198797673575 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630218199477 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452981340354 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118309216942 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319183243426 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.