The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of the public. To what extent do you agree?
Vast amounts of money are invested by governments in attempts to discover extraterrestrial life. A number of people consider it useless, though, and believe that more funding should be provided in order to tackle more vital issues instead. I am inclined to disagree with such an opinion, because space exploration may soon become not just useful, but critical.
First and foremost, finding other forms of life in the universe can facilitate the humanity’s understanding of itself. It can shed light upon, for instance, the origin of species, thus letting man alleviate many intercultural conflicts, which are built on the premises of fundamental differences between people of different races. In addition, discovery of living organisms outside the Earth can give insights into biological phenomena, which are necessary to cure illnesses now deemed terminal. This will have positive effects on public health.
Secondly, researchers may happen to discover another race of sentient beings, who would probably bring about a revolution on our planet with dramatic changes in numerous fields. As a result, we could, for example, learn other methods of food and energy production and construction of dwellings. In effect, this would help the humankind to conquer such problems as famine, land degradation and fossil fuels depletion. Consequently, human society will prosper.
Another idea which is undoubtedly connected with the investigation of extraterrestrial life is colonization of other planets. It may sound unrealistic, but according to many influential scientists and engineers, this could become inevitable due to excessive contamination and exploitation of the environment. A social scientist Mayer Hillman said in an interview for “The Guardian”, that even if the emissions of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere were stopped today, we would not save the planet. The only solution is to evacuate.
All things considered, the exploration of space and, possibly, life in it is a wise and crucial activity. At present, it may be unclear to general public why they should sponsor something so expensive that does not produce immediate results, but it is likely to turn out the most important issue soon.
- Our personalities are predetermined by our genes before we are born and there is nothing that can be done to alter our character traits. To what extent do you agree? 89
- Our personalities are predetermined by our genes before we are born and there is nothing that can be done to alter our character traits. To what extent do you agree? 61
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of the public. To what extent do you agree? 89
- Our personalities are predetermined by our genes before we are born and there is nothing that can be done to alter our character traits To what extent do you agree 57
- Our personalities are predetermined by our genes before we are born and there is nothing that can be done to alter our character traits. To what extent do you agree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 543, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...anet. The only solution is to evacuate. All things considered, the exploration o...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ivity. At present, it may be unclear to general public why they should sponsor something so ex...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1889.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52339181287 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11444139787 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672514619883 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9914140725 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.117647059 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12956795678 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0377584046424 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590231734325 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0649640658313 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532159512338 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.