Many cities of various countries are making their downtown area to no vehicle zone and allow people to enter the centres only on their feet.
In my opinion, the benefits of this change are more significant because it helps to save more fuel and decreases congestion in the public area.
Firstly, if cities prohibit vehicles from entering the city centres, then it may put a significant impact on various businesses and old aged people. Mainly, there are shops and restaurants in downtown and to bring bulky goods without any truck or a car at their place can become a difficult task for many business owners. Also, mainly the senior citizens are physically challenged and walking for them may be impossible for them. For instance, in my city, most of the aged people send someone from their family to the city centre to bring any required item.
However, from my point of view, if people are allowed to travel only on feet in the downtown area, then it can help to reduce traffic congestion as well as noise pollution. Firstly, most of the people have their private car, which results in more and more horn noises and leads to more disturbance and pollution. Hence, this issue can be no longer there in the city centre. Secondly, if there are only people everywhere, then the problem of massive traffic jams can be easily solved. For example, the metropolitan cities in North America have adopted this strategy in their city area and are now free from the issue of noise pollution.
In conclusion, From the essay, it is seen that the advantages of having a pedestrian in city centre outstrip the disadvantages. It not only solves the problem of noise pollution but also decreases traffic congestions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83959044369 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51839670901 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532423208191 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6459067027 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.076923077 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209050782781 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803642558334 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083359998994 0.0667982634062 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137175719763 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101846407475 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.