By the advent of e-buying, an ongoing process of tradition market domination reduction has begun, while some people believe that this process will finally wipe out stores and malls from our settlements. I subscribe to this idea and think convenience and economic efficiency are two contributors to this phenomenon.
Nowadays, shopping websites and apps offering many promotions for their customers like price-checking options, door delivery with no additional charge, and so on. Thanks to these technological advancements, with a clock or two your order will be sent at any destination you like, thus it leaves nothing to be desired. Whereas regular and tangible markets lacking these facilities are overtaken by virtual shopping websites. Therefore, people vastly are invading toward cyber-markets rather than shops on the streets. This trend undoubtedly will lead to digital markets' absolute domination as well as their financial productivity.
Indeed, a long supply chain from factories to mass distributors and retailers is an integrated character of conventional markets. It goes without saying that within this method of trading, every broker keeps its own profit margin, and the result is nothing but unnecessary price inflation. However, online shopping mechanisms, by eliminating second-hand and third-hand solicitors, deliver merchandise to customers directly and as a result increases the economic efficiency of this method, which is equal to price reduction for real customers. Obviously, no one will buy from physical stores anymore, while Amazon website providing quit competitive prices no retailer able to beat. Consequently, under this circumstance, gradually shops and stores will have vanished from our cities' streets.
In conclusion, the more online selling websites and apps will become stretched to everywhere, the more malls and shops will be shut on account of online purchasing provides unprecedented convenience along with a diminished price for its buyers and patrons.
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary
- Essay topics: You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a familyfor six months and look after their six- year-old child.Write a letter to the parents. In your letter- Explain why you would like the job- give details 73
- In order to solve traffic problems essay, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution. 84
- Some people think it s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them Other people believe it s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them Discuss both views and give your opinion 92
- The system used for rubbish/garbage collection in your local area is not working properly. This is causing problems for you and your neighbours. Write a letter to the local council:-describe how rubbish collection system is not working properly.- explain 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s well as their financial productivity. Indeed, a long supply chain from factori...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, however, second, so, therefore, third, thus, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1701.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70805369128 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04660472811 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657718120805 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.006485713 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.846153846 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180508175947 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593630655317 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361448853968 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100885932792 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436119687892 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.