Scientists believe that the earth will become uninhabitable by 2050 due to the extensive damage being done to the environment by humans. While some people assert that nothing can be done to alleviate the negative impact on the Natural World, I strongly argue that several measures can be taken to solve the problem.
The main reason why pessimists deem environmental restoration impossible is the population growth. It seems sensible to a certain extent, as the growth of global population is to inevitably result in a boosting demand of arable land for producing crops, grassland for feeding livestock, and land for building new settlements. Considering the severe land saturation in the contemporary world, deforestation is going to be more common with a heavy price of increasing extinction of plants and animal species whose habitat has been in woodland for thousands of years. What is worse, such is human nature that people would sacrifice environment for the benefits of their own development, especially under such great pressure of survival. Hence, in the view of those opponents, any attempt to reverse this situation is thought in vain.
However, activists proclaim that numerous steps can be taken to protect our planet from further damage and I am firmly convinced that it is never too late to do so. For instance, government is to play a significant role in this international campaign by launching new environmental laws and regulations to control environmental degradation, cut deforestation and deter reckless exploitation of natural resources. In the last decade, one typical example for the governments of any country—rich or poor is Brazil government who has achieved reducing deforestation in Amazon by 70% compared to the average level in 1996-2005, making zero deforestation by 2020—or even sooner—a feasible goal, regardless of its negative impact on economic growth. In addition, the next step in fighting bio-diversity loss is to raise awareness on the reality that some of our activities have left destructive harm on this planet, and will bring disastrous consequences on the whole eco-system. Educational campaigns, like TV programs or public advertisements can be useful to refrain people from ‘slaughtering’ those valuable species without end. In this way, people may be more conscious of the environment to prevent their next generation from being faced with a global resource scarcity.
To conclude, I definitely maintain that the public cannot stand idly by. Instead, governments and individuals can do several things to stop human activity that has damaging effects on our planet.
- Some people think that famous people’s support towards international aids organisations draws attention to problems, while other think that celebrities make the problems less important.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 89
- In the modern society, schools are no longer necessary as we could have so much information throughout the internet that children could study at home as well. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- 'Prevention is better than cure'.Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 84
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Topic Many people say that universities should only offer to young students with high marks others say that they should accept people of all ages even if they did not do well Discuss both views and give your own opinions 96
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, while, even so, for instance, in addition, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2232.0 1615.20841683 138% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43065693431 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23242213732 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60097323601 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 693.0 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.6968405631 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.8 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233572023794 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708400055964 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677041205918 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141268609203 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734174596854 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.