Human activity has had negative impacts on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed while others believe that actions can be taken to bring about a change.
Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
Plants and animals are the most crucial part of environment. Environment is the surroundings or conditions in which all living bodies such as person, plants and animals lives or operates. Human hustle has harmful effects on other living bodies around the world. According to handful of people it is futile to change the situation while remaining people affirm that it is possible to alter the scenario by executing the actions. This essay will discuss both the views before reaching reasoned conclusion.
Increased population is the fundamental reason for destruction of forest. Deforestation is often seen at large-scale in the developing countries. It leads to the impairment of the living in a forest. It eradicates the habitat of them. Abolishing habitat of plants and animals causes extinction of rare species. For instance, entire world witnessed about the last rhino on the earth and it came into everyone’s attentions after the huge loss of one of the rare species. Humans have damaged the environment to that extent that it is almost impossible to take effort to save them.
On the other hand, people consider that awareness and government actions may assist to change the situation. Governments should encourage animal and plants conservation groups and activities. More awareness should be raise to avoid problems of killing the habitat of plants and animals. Tree plantation and animal conservation should be promoted at greater extent. For example, In India tree plantation is promoted by reducing use tree product and more conservationist groups are working for save Tiger program. Government should abolish the hunting of wild animals and strict actions should be made to against hunters. Usage of leather product could be entirely ban which consequently will save the wild habitat.
To summarize, it is true that actions will not fill the loss of extinct animals and plants although aforementioned actions should be executed to save the environment from the damages.
- Many things that used to be done in home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 73
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industries to move to regional areas outside large urban centers. Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industries to move to regional areas outside large urban centers. Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 67
- Many things that used to be done in home by hands are now being done by machines.Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 73
- Most employers interview candidates before hiring them. Do you think this is the best way to do it, or are there better alternatives? In your opinion, what is the best method for choosing employees? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'raised'?
Suggestion: raised
...nd activities. More awareness should be raise to avoid problems of killing the habita...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, may, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35238095238 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88088897565 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546031746032 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0626099998 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228149798725 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628856813566 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462936070445 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13311883293 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540343404761 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.