With increase population and even growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots.
What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty?
How can this be solved?
It is argued that the growth in population, along with the enlargement of metropolitan areas during recent years cause a decrease in the number of natural beauty objects. The ever increasing number of people living on earth may in future lead to a loss of many natural sightseeing places. This essay will firstly discuss the advantages of keeping natural places of interest safe and secondly, will suggest solutions to the above-mentioned issue.
There are many positive impacts natural beauty spots have, including their effect on health and economy. First of all, such places help people obtain mental stability and peace, which is especially important for those, who live in big cities most of the time. Secondly, this kind of vacation spots can be a key for the development of tourism and help out a country’s economy, as a result. Hot springs, snowy mountains, cliffy beaches and endless forests are what people look for shall they want to rest their minds from daily routine.
There are various steps that can be taken to solve the problem of damaging natural beauty spots, such as control over the number of population and usage of living areas more wisely. During recent years, the number of population has been increasing in the highest rates ever in the history. As a measure of dealing with the phenomenon, Governments may use some birth controlling tools. For instance, Chinese government has set taxes for every next child born, starting from the second. Another way to reduce the treat is using living space more efficiently, instead of enlarging cities at the expense of the nature. As an example, local authorities and those charged with governance may set limitations on living areas per person. For example, a single person can only have a large apartment for additional charges or taxes.
To conclude, in my opinion increasing population is a possible treat to spots of natural beauty worldwide, however there are several actions that can be taken to avoid any fatal result.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-07 | hoangquyen1904 | 84 | view |
| 2020-06-25 | oyondev007 | 95 | view |
| 2020-04-05 | Amarpreet Singh | 78 | view |
- You have recently attended a 90th birthday party of a close relative. It was successfully organised by hotel staff. Write a letter to the manager and say– Describe the event.– Talk about the facilities provided to guests, especially the elderly.– Me 84
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- With increase population and even growing urban centers, many countries are losing their natural beauty spots.What benefits are there to protect places of natural beauty?How can this be solved? 89
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development, but some important social values are lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads Do you agree or disagree 95
Comments
Please correct my essay .
Please correct my essay .
Essay:
In some cities and towns all over the world, the high volume of traffic is a problem.
What are the causes of this and what actions can be taken to solve this problem?
Answer:
Across the world, rising traffic and transportation has been a major issue. The aftermath effect of this is causing severe damage on environment too. This essay will delve on some of the causes of it and the prevention required to overcome the same.
The increase in the number of vehicles on road aggrevates the commuting time with in the city. If the traffic is more, then it takes longer duration for a person to reach home after work. Hence, most of the time people suffer on road in stucking traffic. The other major effect of the traffic is, rise in air pollution due to the emission of carbon-di-oxide from the vehicle. This not only pollutes the air but also alleviates the temperature. In addition to this, it reduces the life expectancy of humans. To illustrate, as per the survey conducted in Delhi, the quality of air has reduced due to heavy vehicles, thus the life expectancy as reduced by 20 per cent compare to earlier days.
However, nothing is impossible. People still can correct themselves by being responsible for these destructions. Firstly, enacting stringent rules by government on traffic and usage of personal vehicles, certainly foster the changes. The China has brought a rule of odd or even, where vehicles with odd numbers come on road on one day followed by even number the next day. This would drastically detriment the vehicle count on the road. Secondly, local council and NGOs has to campaign to develop the awarness and benefits of Car pooling and using public transport. So, people can make use of it for their daily commute to work.
To conclude, although, all these days, we have destroyed our lifestyle and the quality of living, atleast now the government has to take action to impose strict laws to reduce the volume of traffic in all the cities. Furthermore, limiting birth rate adds huge benefit to resolve this concern.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, as a result, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07250755287 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63126558248 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592145015106 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4466017078 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.933333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0666666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275429684457 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0840486773505 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730780357324 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169830877375 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281623698236 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.