An increasing number of people are preferring to eat fast food regularly, it causes a lot of heath issues. Some people think the only solution is to ban it completely. Do you agree or disagree?
In the modern era with a fast paced lifestyle, people nowadays did not get enough time to cook their meals from scratch. At that time, they opt methods which give food in a speedy manner like processed foods or easy-to-make foods. Such options are easier to look but they are creating issues related to health, opined by some people to completely ban these kind of meals. I totally disagree with the idea, buttressing it in upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, fast food is the better alternative than that of its counterpart, traditional cooked food in terms of the ease to made. However, when it comes to the nutritional values, the former come into the least preferred option. The reason behind this can be the unassurance of the manufacturing process as of which materials are used, cooking procedures etcetera. But, again they provide the nutritional values either on their labels or on their menus.
On the flip side, if the authorities impose a permanent ban on such items, then this can create a hurdle in people’s lives. There is no denying the fact that processed and ready cooked foods have become a habit of their lives and by doing so, they have to manage more time in already busy timeline. Besides that, having fast food in the time of need or on occasions can not create a bad impact on people’s health. In order to tackle health issues, they should be made aware about such items and their consequences on regular usage. Moreover, proper time management should be encouraged to ensure proper meals and adequate workout, as only changing eating habits will not help the overall health.
To conclude, banning fast food is totally unjustifiable as it is not the only remedy to improve people’s health. Instead of this, collection of different actions should be done.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-10 | Harsimran-Singh | 85 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.in what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?Has the become a positive or negative development? 61
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine However at best these methods are ineffective and at worst they may be dangerous To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- Should ordinary man be given the license to keep a revolver and gun 82
- When a country develops its technology, traditional skills and ways of life die. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- To some construction of beautiful building is merely a waste of money However for others these buildings are a source of aesthetic beauty and are beneficial in mamy other ways Give you own views 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a speedy manner" with adverb for "speedy"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... time, they opt methods which give food in a speedy manner like processed foods or easy-to-make fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...opined by some people to completely ban these kind of meals. I totally disagree with the i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'procedures'' or 'procedure's'?
Suggestion: procedures'; procedure's
...as of which materials are used, cooking procedures etcetera. But, again they provide the n...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91803278689 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65411000514 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609836065574 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.1041043306 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180249224846 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599744178302 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534255830341 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116745532863 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384938246828 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.