Undoubtedly, the Internet has revolutionized the communication and takes its place in the individual's life. Many people believe that the use of the internet and instant message services has a dramatic growth and as a result of that direct connection is fading of the modern lives. In my point of view, network connections absolutely have especial advantages which caused it to be popular; nevertheless, face to face relationships and meetings preserve its own value for people.
The internet is not the replacement of the face to face conversations. Meetings and in person's conversations contain body languages and emotional expression which never exist in text messaging or typed expressions. Moreover, text likely caused a type of misunderstanding or a lack of comprehension in content. It means that the exact meaning of the senders' sentences in a written context could not be specified clearly due to the fact that each reader has his or her own impression of the text and lead them to a misunderstanding. Therefore, in person meetings could not be removed from regular life.
On the other hand, the internet has plenty of benefits that make it treasured in the people's life especially individual conversations. The social networks have no time and place limitation, so, people could connect to each other from a long distance whenever they need, just required a bunch of clicks. In fact, the distance relationships would not be a dream anymore because of internet and text messaging.
In conclusion, many people believe that text messaging correlations significantly enhanced that individuals might forget direct conversations. In my opinion, although, social networks have major advantages, a face to face connection has other utilized pros which do not exist on the internet such as, body language or emotional expressions.
- Crime rate, in most countries, is often higher in urban areas than in rural areas. Why do you think that is? What can be done to reduce the crime rate? 61
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 61
- In many countries plastic bags are the main source of rubbish causing pollution in oceans and on land; therefore they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- Every one of us should become a vegetarian because eating meat can cause serious health problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.) 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ommunication and takes its place in the individuals life. Many people believe that the use ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... benefits that make it treasured in the peoples life especially individual conversation...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...because of internet and text messaging. In conclusion, many people believe that ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...uals might forget direct conversations. In my opinion, although, social networks h...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'moreover', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'therefore', 'in conclusion', 'in fact', 'such as', 'as a result', 'in my opinion', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.3 0.247107183377 121% => OK
Verbs: 0.125 0.155533422707 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.08125 0.0946595960268 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.05625 0.0501214627716 112% => OK
Pronouns: 0.034375 0.0437548338989 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115625 0.122226691241 95% => OK
Participles: 0.021875 0.0403226058552 54% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.23898793683 2.80594681477 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.021875 0.0326793684256 67% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.103125 0.0861772015684 120% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.015625 0.021408717616 73% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.015625 0.011925033212 131% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1838.0 1933.35771543 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 316.048096192 92% => OK
Chars per words: 6.31615120275 6.12580529183 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20517956788 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.374570446735 0.374742101984 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309278350515 0.28420135186 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.240549828179 0.203846283523 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.151202749141 0.137316102897 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23898793683 2.80594681477 115% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.037074148 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53264604811 0.56093040696 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 53.8849913173 60.7387585426 89% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0891783567 81% => OK
Sentence length: 22.3846153846 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2530641441 49.517814964 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.384615385 127.492653851 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.846153846154 0.814263465372 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.99599198397 100% => OK
Readability: 53.3124504362 49.1944974215 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.02898550725 1.69124875643 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346112135222 0.332605444948 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112272618931 0.102741220458 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.065374421156 0.0668466124924 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.546768704375 0.534860350844 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.124573774141 0.148594505496 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154958846401 0.134430193775 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954256060606 0.0742795772207 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.389670451244 0.324371583561 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.112836804624 0.0638462369009 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246485648011 0.228012699653 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0558652094514 0.058150111329 96% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.68436873747 58% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 5.90881763527 68% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 2.5751503006 194% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.