Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
It is a common belief among many people that raising the price of fuel for vehicles will lead to low air and noise pollution as well as no traffic issues. However, I strongly disagree that this is not the most effective solution because it will lead to inflation whereas raising direct taxes on private vehicles could prove more beneficial.
Raising the cost of petrol not only put burden of extra transportation cost but also in form of inclined price of all other commodities. This is due to fact that all the products used in household and offices are being transported from various regions to supermarkets. So ultimately, higher expenses of shipping will be passed on to consumers and customers have to bear the additional expenditures for purchasing food, clothes and any other goods. To evident my point of view, a report published by OPEC nations state that higher charges for fossil fuels effected negatively for country’s economy rather than to resolve pollution related problems.
The most prominent solution for curbing the carbon emission from vehicles is to levy incredibly excessive duties on buying cars and bikes. As heavy governmental charges will restrict people to own cars which in turn population towards public transportation. The less personal vehicles on roads not only reduces the exhaustion of carbon dioxide but also sort out the issue of expanding traffic. Singapore, despite of being a small island nation, is able to deal with both problems by introducing various types of tariff on car which raise its final price by 400%, making it non affordable for its most population.
In view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that keeping private modes of transportation out of reach from humans can effectively assist in halting the greater exhaustion from vehicles and curtail the matter of traffic flow. In contrast steeped rate of petrol will only create anger in public due to ascended cost of supplies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-09-17 | heni Imroatul | 56 | view |
| 2020-06-28 | sanjay marwaha | 92 | view |
- Some people believe that watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and state your opinion 89
- The chart and graph below give information about sales and share prices for Coca-Cola.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
- Some people believe that watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and state your opinion 95
- Your English teacher has found a new penfriend for you. Write a letter to the penfriendIntroduce yourselfTell them what you like doing in your free timeAsk your penfriend to tell you about their hobbies and interests 89
- People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...essive duties on buying cars and bikes. As heavy governmental charges will restric...
^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... curtail the matter of traffic flow. In contrast steeped rate of petrol will only create...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, whereas, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12852664577 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73644549753 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614420062696 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.0731102694 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.333333333 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5833333333 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.082171010421 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286056246925 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270948866251 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0493475649414 0.151304729494 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0141663613374 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.