Internet contains a lot of information however sometimes this information is inaccurate or wrong Do you agree or disagree with this statement

Information have been proven to be power, and the invention of the internet has taken that power to a whole new level. A lot of information is contained in the World Wide Web, however, sometimes this Information is said to be wrong or inaccurate. However, in my opinion, I agree that most informations on the internet are wrong or inaccurate. In this essay I will discuss how Wong informations are uploaded as publicity stunts by celebrities, and the panic created by unverified posts from anonymous platforms online.

To begin with, most celebrities engage in publicity stunts because they want to gain more followers online. For instance, a Nigerian music artist named "Skibii" debunked a death rumor after his management team used it to engage more fans on the internet. Similarly, when there was news that a local skit maker in my neighborhood was kidnapped, it was debunked by him as he dropped a skit to engage his fans. To summarize, it is seen that inaccurate informations are contained on the internet because celebs make publicity stunts to engage the public.

To continue, some anonymous platforms online can create panic in the society whenever it posts unverified information capable of causing civil unrest. For example, there is panic in the South-Eastern part of Nigeria because of unverified frightening posts made by a group claiming to be the Indigenous People of Biafra. In addition, there was an unverified post last year about a soldier couple killed by bandits, and the event almost causes civil unrest. Thus, wrong informations are contained on the World Wide Web as unverified posts made to create panic in our society.

In conclusion, in this essay I have discussed how Wong informations are uploaded as publicity stunts by celebrities, and the panic created by unverified posts from anonymous platforms online.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14900662252 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01727588629 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496688741722 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.8255375986 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.615384615 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249684863437 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103627108077 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105730253907 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156061811183 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117515606014 0.056905535591 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.