It is believed that children from countries with a high level of unemployment should be offered only primary education and should not be offered with a secondary education as it is unlikely they will get a job in the future anyway. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Unemployment rate in countries with poor capacity to offer jobs soars over time. Children of such nations shall be deprived of secondary education as the current labor market is barely able to ensure employment of current candidates, is thought by many. I strongly disagree with the statement as I believe that capacitating them for self-employment is a viable alternative in the form of entrepreneurship educaiton as well as technical learning.
Surviving in a stagnant economy requires mastery in self-employment and the younglings have to get the preparation from the very beginning of their life. In case, the people are provided with the knowledge of entrepreneurship, they will become equiped to take the risk of commencing their own venture. Moreover, they can start earning during their study rather than seeking for a job after completing educaiton. According to Business Times, for instance, 35% students start their own business after college and continue with university education side-by-side. If a government find it difficult to ensure employment for the public, they must focus on raring teen-agers with entrepreneurship skills which will not only help them manage their own career, but also fuel the engine of a static economic system.
Though a labor market might become dormant, demand for service industry is always in demand. In other words, individuals with technical training find themselves occupied round the clock providing services both in houses and workshops. Career of a carpenter, for example, is never influenced by the economic condition of a country. Similarly, plumbers and electricians will be called no matter if the house-owner has a job. From that sense, to fight unemployment rate, authorities can focus on providing students with technical education to ensure that they can earn on their own using their special skills. Development of technical experts can help the government stabilize domestic labor market as welll as earn foreign remittance by exporting human-resources, in both cases, the citizens enjoy bright career.
To conclude, though high rate of unemployment have devastating effect on parents, they can reshape their kind’s future by properly planning educaiton path focusing self-employment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-21 | vutum | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | virtualpathum | 61 | view |
- Many people prefer to spend money and not save it. What are the reasons? Is it a positive or negative development? 84
- Nowadays, some celebrities such as film stars, sportsmen and pop musicians are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? Which jobs should be highly paid? 95
- Many people believe that it’s better to learn something in a group rather than individually. Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Today it is common practice for many business meetings and business training to take place online. Do the advantages of this new development outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- Some people believe that young people bring more profits to a company Others say that older people actually bring more profits Discuss both views and give your opinion 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, second, similarly, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57971014493 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16966031016 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594202898551 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 587.7 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.800949658 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.13333333333 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212001273135 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688887654858 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524853523042 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12781659233 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531402202648 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.