It is not necessary to travel to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people. We can learn just as much from books, films and the internet . Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that people can gain their understandings of different cultures through books, films or the Internet instead of visiting those regions. Personally, I totally disagree with this view.
The first reason for this is because the amount of knowledge that we obtain from those kinds of mass communications is not completely accurate. Some media want to attract tourists and make profit; thus, they write different things about the territories. There are abundant sources of data, so we can easily misunderstand the customs and traditions in several countries if we don’t travel to those places. Moreover, the negative information which was provided on some newspapers, for instance, may narrow our mind to a unique and biased perspective.
Another point to consider is that accessing directly to the culture of other nations may be the fattest and most efficient way of learning. In other words, we should discover the cultures, points of view and ways of living of those countries by ourselves instead of spending time looking at the picture in the textbook or watching films. For example, while traveling to other regions, we can make friends with the residents and take part in some particular activities there such as joining the local festival, visiting famous stores and restaurants or trying their specialties. This can helps us broaden our hands-on experience and remain an extremely vivid memory.
In conclusion, I believe that using books, films and the Internet to get considerable acquaintance of diverse cultures is a good method of studying. However; by travelling ourselves, we can derive not only true but also reliable understandings about the regions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 588, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'help'
Suggestion: help
...s or trying their specialties. This can helps us broaden our hands-on experience and ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 150, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... cultures is a good method of studying. However; by travelling ourselves, we can derive...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28358208955 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88507887361 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649253731343 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1298442839 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222641536093 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711377642752 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465699173315 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13147694983 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270167425306 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.