Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result, people gravitate towards buying their products.
What problems does it cause?
What could be done to encourage people to buy local products?
Two days ago, I read an article about the influence of big enterprises on the local market. The author states that both promotion and advertisement, which are widely used by corporations, affect the preferences in shopping. This essay will consider the problems of this change and suggest steps to stimulate people to purchase domestic goods.
The first problem is the pressure on domestic companies. When a corporation opens its branches in the region, many individual entrepeneurs start to suffer from the unequal competition with it since they have insufficient finding either to introduce themselves in the media nor hold any promotions. Another problem with the entry of corporations in the area is growing prices. Once the dominance in the market is reached by various advertising campaigns, large businesses tend to gradually increase the prices for their products. The last problem is a narrow range of products available. As soon as corporations prevail in the market, they hinder the entry of other companies into the market. As a result, people can neither enjoy other high-quality products devised by other companies nor do shopping at a lower price.
One of the measures to arouse public interest in buying local products is for the government to introduce them to the market. Generally, it is hardly possible to find the information about domestic producers on TV and radio, since they do not have as much budget for advertisement as corporations. Despite this, if the government supported them by freely allocating a time to advertise local products on the state channels, they would have the opportunity to present their local products to the public. Consequently, domestic manufacturers would be familiar to society and, therefore, be able to compete with large businesses. Furthermore, the state could both subsidize local manufacturers and exempt them from some taxes, so they would be able to lower their prices and expand their production.
In conclusion, even though large companies pose many problems to the local market, the government could raise public awareness of local products by showing their local products in the media and assist internal manufacturers financially.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Aman.Kansal1234 | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | ochirvaani | 73 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | Glenn20sal | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | Tolik | 84 | view |
| 2019-04-08 | Tolik | 78 | view |
- Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- Some people believe that modern technology encourages more sociable behaviour others say that this leads to lesser sociable behaviour discuss both views with examples and provide your opinion 95
- As a result of tourism and the increasing number of people traveling, there is an growing demand for more flights.What problems does this have on the environment?What measures could be taken to solve the problems? 89
- All over the world, societies are facing a growing problem with obesity. This problem affects both children and adults.What are the reasons for this rise in obesity? How could it be tackled? 61
- You recently stayed in a hotel in a large city. The weather was very unusual for the time of year and the heating system in the hotel was quite inadequate.Write a letter to the manager of the hotel. In your letter:give details of what went wrongexplain wh 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34482758621 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98294132721 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7260221467 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286319362299 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833861628253 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04829337668 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159980039054 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340767308195 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.