In the digital era, social media allows people to be easily connected. The same applies to celebrities: the line between the public and private spheres is blurred. Further, it is argued among people in the society whether celebrities have the right to privacy. For a variety of reasons, which will be outlined in the following paragraphs, I personally disagree with that point of view.
Many people are convinced that celebrities have no right to privacy; the celebrities earn a large amount of money by sacrificing their privacy. In other words, famous people could easily earn money by posting a picture on Instagram. It may seem like easy work to do; however, the cost of it is losing their own privacy.
On the other hand, celebrities are also people-- just like everyone else. The right to privacy must apply equally to every people, without prejudice. Whether they are famous or not, the media must respect their privacy. There must be a clear line between celebrities’ working sphere and private sphere. For instance, the media could interview or taking pictures of celebrities when they are at events, but the media could not go and hound the celebrities while they are having dinner with their family. That is to say, the press must not intrude on celebrities’ private sphere. Hence, I strongly disagree with this statement, since I believe that everyone has the right to privacy: no exception.
To conclude, celebrities are human; thus, their human rights shall be respected. Therefore, based on the reasons given in the foregoing paragraph, I firmly disagree with the statement.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in other words, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09505703422 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67814518873 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555133079848 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9316882918 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.75 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4375 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198778885844 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688400930796 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526539460667 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122480775442 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504007745976 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.