The length of working week does not reflect modern lifestyle needs. It should be substantially reduced to give people more leisure time and time with their families. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Some are of the opinion that the working week has to be shorter as people should have more time for the rest and quality time with their families. I completely agree with this notion as nowadays numerous working processes are automated and there is less demand in labour.
First, technological progress is rapidly evolving nowadays; more and more working processes are made by machines. In fact, modern equipment produces products faster and frequently are of better quality than hand-made ones. However, despite the fact that there is no urgent need for long-working hours, modern people struggle to keep a working-life balance. To illustrate, parents are not able to provide proper upbringing for the younger generation or spend quality hours with a family because, in general both parents have full time jobs and it consumes all their energy and time.
Nevertheless, all around the world can be observed that the rate of unemployment is increasing due to automation. Even office jobs, nowadays, demand less effort because of computerization. For instance, I found myself and my colleagues often just wasting our time at the office with nothing to do. The key to solving the above issues will be reducing working hours or the duration of the working week. Thus, people will work more efficiently and have the opportunity to pay more attention to other activities.
In conclusion, I totally support the idea to shorten the length of the working week as it is more suitable in modern reality. This change lets people balance their work and life and as a result live more happily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-26 | Mariamirabella | 78 | view |
| 2020-05-24 | Kulpreet Kaur | 89 | view |
- Your colleague loaned you a book to use in a presentation at work Write to your friend to say What the presentation was about Why it was important How the book helped you 73
- Some believe that money for education should mainly be spent on better computers while others believe it would be better spent on teachers Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 73
- More people are spending their free time watching movies? Why? Good or bad. 61
- Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers Other people believe that it results in disadvantages for workers Discuss both the views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...that the working week has to be shorter as people should have more time for the re...
^^
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...y because, in general both parents have full time jobs and it consumes all their energy a...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...life and as a result live more happily.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07251908397 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70771063277 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595419847328 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8808623204 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.230769231 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348826183871 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112794102645 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0801154262651 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218090193448 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0497879277836 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.