Maintaining public libraries waste of money since computer technology is replacing their functions.To what extend do you agree or disagree.
It has been suggested investing money to conserve public libraries are utterly meaning less. Because, computer technology does could better functions than public libraries. However, in my opinion, I do disagree with the statement.
To begin with, there are innumerable facts associated in order to maintain the collection places. First and foremost, individuals do have opportunity to access for enormous historical informations from the library resources. But, in computers do not available old details; because, some of data were not fed into the machines. Therefore, it is inevitable to inject a large number of funds to preserve those accumulations.
Furthermore, the public library is the premises where professionals use to gather. As a result, people would be able to share their knowledge considerably. However, these benefits would not be able to receive from the technological appliances. For instance, if someone is planning to do academic exams he or she has the opportunity to collect exam tips and strategies from other professionals but also with less cost-effective individuals can borrow the textbooks and other materials.
In addition, people would be able to concentrate their readings and other practical works in a peaceful environment with fewer sound pollutions. For example, if someone need to mentally relax themselves the public library is the ideal location.
On the contrary, opponents may say having and investing in libraries not useful at all. Because, it needs huge spaces to stockpile those documents but also to maintain those collections government has to pay a large amount of money to employees.
In conclusion, the aforementioned anecdotal positive evidence precisely proven in favour of preserving public libraries. Therefore, government should act to take all the measures to inject more funds to build and maintain the public libraries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-21 | shah@sbl182 | 73 | view |
- As the population of the world growingvery quickly, the only long term solution to the problem of overpopulation is for human to settle other planets.What benefit has the world got from the world exploration?Do you think humans will live on other planets. 84
- Maintaining public libraries waste of money since computer technology is replacing their functions.To what extend do you agree or disagree. 73
- the trend of purchasing goods at large shopping malls as compared to small shops 56
- Some people believe that children should go to extra classes after school. Others, however, think that children should spend that time playing instead. Discuses both views and give your own opinion. 84
Comments
wonderful I am realy happy to
wonderful I am realy happy to see my essay status.good output I have chances to improve more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ting money to conserve public libraries are utterly meaning less. Because, computer technology does...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lic libraries are utterly meaning less. Because, computer technology does could better ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the data') or simply say ''some data''.
Suggestion: some of the data; some data
... do not available old details; because, some of data were not fed into the machines. Therefo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
.... Therefore, it is inevitable to inject a large number of funds to preserve those accumulations. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ary is the premises where professionals use to gather. As a result, people would be...
^^^
Line 8, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'collections'' or 'collection's'?
Suggestion: collections'; collection's
...se documents but also to maintain those collections government has to pay a large amount of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57291666667 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13138044626 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1314039092 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4117647059 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8235294118 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189153732999 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0581559518843 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033464420042 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957099802954 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405744779686 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.