It is rightly said that the way you speak defines your personality. Some people believe that it is utmost important to speak well in public, and present yourself appropriately, thus, this skill should be taught in schools. This essay will explore constructive arguments to support the above notion.
Undeniably, speaking is the most powerful tool of communication. One cannot express his or her emotions without speaking aptly which could be a severe disadvantage in various professions. Politician, for instance, will not be able to connect to audience if this kill is lacking. Moreover, the person feels confident when he or she communicates flawlessly and vice-versa. Showcasing yourself by speaking fluently enhances the social capability of the person. It is observed that people who speaks more are more social and extrovert in comparison to people who believe in less exchange of words.
Admittedly, schools acts a base for shaping the child's growth; therefore, communication training should be a part of curriculum. Also, it is not that straightforward, as a result, educated staff is required to engrave this skill in to the students. In addition to this, children learn from practice and school can held various competitions such as debate, so that children can participate and understand its basic principles. According to researches, schools are the best platform to make children learn anything.
In conclusion, speaking confidently is important and requires a great deal of effort and cannot be learnt in a day or two, but daily practice in schools with other children can help achieve the target swiftly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33852140078 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05278646745 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630350194553 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4379915399 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317688715235 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861536794555 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892773448176 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172514820754 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0738743527266 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.