In many cities, planners have separated schools, homes, shops, offices in specific areas which were widely separated from each other. Do you think advantages of this policy outweigh disadvantages to the city residents?
Nowadays it is a common practice to build cities consisting of several thematic zones like shopping, education, working and living areas. Some people hold the opinion that such planning develop infrastructure. Others, on the contrary, maintain that traffic jams takes a lot of time. Personally, I believe that this urban planning has both positive and negative sides.
The main reason for my propensity for a positive attitude toward the separated cities on areas is that each location is responsible for one function and citizens can choose between sections, which help to save their time on the road. Undoubtedly, well developed infrastructure successfully combine sustainable urban development and economic growth what leads to increasing living standards. In addition, if government plants trees between locations it will refresh the air of cities and increase their attractiveness for life and work. city parks and public gardens serve as filters to capture dust particles emitted by cars, industrial facilities and other sources, as well as purify the atmosphere.
There is another factor that deserves some attention, such as the dramatic increase in the number of citizens in recent times because of overpopulation on the planet. Thereby, the number of vehicles is increased too, which means hours of traffic jams. Obviously, cities built on the principle "town in town" when shops, schools, work in a walking distance from the house has no such problem and due to this are more comfortable to live in.
In conclusion, the question of division of cities into areas is a difficult one to answer definitely. However, based on the reasons analyzed above I believe that in various cities constructions each person can choose comfortable habitat.
- In many countries, very few young people read newspapers or follow the news on TV. What do you think are the causes of this? What solutions can you suggest? 78
- Science is advanced so fast that it can now make it possible for people to live 100 years or even 200 years Some people think it is beneficial while others think it will cause problems Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- In today's job market it is far more important to have practical skills than theoretical knowledge. In the future, job applicants may not need any formal qualifications.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- In many cities, planners have separated schools, homes, shops, offices in specific areas which were widely separated from each other. Do you think advantages of this policy outweigh disadvantages to the city residents? 67
- 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 537, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: City
...their attractiveness for life and work. city parks and public gardens serve as filte...
^^^^
Line 6, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o this are more comfortable to live in. In conclusion, the question of division ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42391304348 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92542568132 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644927536232 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1900822127 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.153846154 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126095077542 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359016020023 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334152711089 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0683104290842 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230075034018 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.