in many countries, paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common.
Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages?
Purchasing goods have been a common phenomena in our lives since ages. However, paying through mobile phone for any purchase has come in to picture in modern days with the advent of technology. This essay will showcase the positives of using e-wallet and paying online far surpasses its negatives with detailed analysis in the below paragraphs.
Undeniably, humans are addicted to comfort, and nothing more convenient can be discovered than e-wallets. Paying via phone is extremely viable and hassle free as one does not have to carry the weight of physical wallet. People who have the tendency to forget taking wallets to market gets a relief with this invention. Additionally, the applications that support online transfer of money are authorized and safe, therefore it can be used undoubtedly without the fear of money robbery which people often have to face when they use physical wallet. A recent news featured a young man who got robbed late night has lost a huge amount of cash that was in his wallet.
Another relative known positive feature that warrants favoring online money transfer is that one can track how much money is spent day in and day out. Many times it happens that people looses the record of money spent on each department. However, with mobile phones, one can analyze the expenditure made in just few clicks. Not only tracking is the valuable point, but also less time consumption. People do not have to stand in long queues as there are separate queues for cashless transactions in most of the places which are more quick and consequently saves time.
By and large, the above salient points mentioned states that e-wallets or online transactions are trending and more people should adopt this way to walk hand in hand with technology and development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-16 | thadsha1999 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | yasaman-pooshidani | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | minhhh123 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | bilal_chaudhry | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | shadow1222 | 73 | view |
- Some think newspapers are the best method for reading the news while others think other media is better Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
- The demand for coaching services has grown significantly in the digital age with online coaching platforms becoming prevalent Some now feel online coaching is a superior option to in person coach To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- You have been living in a rental apartment for the past year Recently a new neighbour moved in and has been making a lot of noise which disturbs you Write a letter to the landlord In your letter explain the situation describe why it bothers you suggest a 73
- Many can t speak or present well in public Some people think that it is important to speak well in public so the training should be from school Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some think newspapers are the best method for reading the news while others think other media is better Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'phenomenon'?
Suggestion: phenomenon
Purchasing goods has been a common phenomena in our lives since ages. However, payin...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, so, therefore, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01006711409 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53990493263 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634228187919 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8930100053 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.642857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.35714285714 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184337066234 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580379628697 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419289903901 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104584999943 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320183042704 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.