In many countries, people are moving away from rural areas and towards urban areas.
Why do you think that is?
What problems can this cause?
Urbanization is a major problem of current time. Anecdotal evidences shows rapid migration of people from rural areas to urban area. Such movement is after-effect of various problem faced by these rural people due to their negligence by the ruling parties. Such rapid turnaround in the mobilization of labor force will lead to variety of consequences to be borne by all.
Firstly, rural areas are major source of development of primary sector in the economy, which cannot compete with secondary and territory section for economic growth. Accordingly, it does not provides much incentives to politicians to expand their investment towards rural sector. It leads to lower income growth, lack of basic facilities, education, development and many more adverse effect on rural growth. Having hope of growth, personal development and better prospects for their children, people start migrating to urban area. Their success stories encourage others to participate in the same process and enjoy their right of better living and better future for the children.
Further, such massive migration results in the population growth in urban area which put on higher burden on scare resources available in urban areas. Moreover, such shift leads to reduction in labor force in rural areas and contributes to lower productivity. Continuous population expansion in urban areas lead to scare resource available for higher prices to reach equilibrium on the demand supply curve and lead such amenities out of reach of socially poor class and fits in budget of only affluent class of society, which in turn makes the former to use unlawful means to achieve such benefits. Continuous penetration of scare resources lead to crime, unethical behavior and so more.
To end, migration of people from rural to urban areas has its own pros and cons and need to be looked after by the government.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-21 | gsw.singh@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2018-10-27 | tanwi1988 | 78 | view |
- Some people think governments should spend less money on arts and invest more in education.How far do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 11
- Some people argue that technological inventions such as mobile phones are making people socially less interactive Do you agree or disagree 92
- Some people blame the government for the increase in childhood obesity while others think it is the parents’ fault. Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.Do you agree or disagree? 84
- Some people argue that technological inventions, such as mobile phones, are making people socially less interactive.Do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provide'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: provide
...onomic growth. Accordingly, it does not provides much incentives to politicians to expan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 192, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
...onomic growth. Accordingly, it does not provides much incentives to politicians to expan...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 201, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...owth. Accordingly, it does not provides much incentives to politicians to expand the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, second, so, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26666666667 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70769274476 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563333333333 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8283731932 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.857142857 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195443404453 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079541693883 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647641358729 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135446599294 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461833792179 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.