Nowadays, more and more people prefer food outside where they live to that grown in their own local area. Therefore, a lot of food people eat today is from different countries. It seems to me that issue brings more benefits than disadvantages.
Firstly, people could experience a variety of food. For example, some types of vegetables are not grown in their place because of weather conditions but they could develop well in other places. Like lettuce, they just live in regions with cold weather. Also, food coming from other regions could make your meal more delicious as well as nutrient. It must be tedious if everyday you eat the same kind of food. Experiencing a range of food could make you feel better and more excited with your meal.
Secondly, It might be efficient to enhance the economy of agriculture. The truth is a certain type of food in this region could be very grown well and the local residents could not consume it in a short period of time, which leads to that a lot of farmers could not sell their produces. However, thanks to development of transportation and high demand of people for a wider variety of food, a lot of peasants could sell vegetables as well as other farming products more easily and gain a huge profit.
Looking at the trend, we could see that customers as well as sellers have a lot of benefits and local government do not to take steps too much to help farmers when they could not sell the produces. Distributing food to other areas could deal with the problems of demands and supplies, everyone all has advantages.
In conclusion, I agree that a lot of food coming from different regions in a world is completely in a good side.
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015. 73
- the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 61
- In many countries, people like to eat a wider variety of food than can be grown intheir local area. As a result, much of the food people eat today has to come fromother regions. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh thedisadvantages? 61
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fer food outside where they live to that grown in their own local area. Therefore...
^^
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntries. It seems to me that issue brings more benefits than disadvantages. First...
^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... very grown well and the local residents could not consume it in a short period o...
^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...idents could not consume it in a short period of time, which leads to that a lot of farmers c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63087248322 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53119806619 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526845637584 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6648780195 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26624478835 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103622392355 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744251680656 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150264087666 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0676612844063 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 12.4159519038 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.