Life is full of duality; nothing exists without its polar counterparts. In this context, usage of plastic container is not an exception. Though it has made human life comfortable, it entails several drawbacks. I strongly believe that the advantages of disadvantages of consumption of plastic products in restaurant industries have equally significant weight; one cannot outweigh the other.
There are irrefutable benefits of formable boxes. Firstly, it is very cost effective for the beverages company compared to other materials as cost of manufacturing is low, which help the company to increase its profit margin. To illustrate, for beverages company, the plastic bottles are four times cheaper than glass vessels. Secondly, the formable bottes and containers are easy to carry as it is light in terms of weight as well as having multi use. For example, people use plastic container for various purposes like to store grains, to carry water, and many more.
However, a few of many disadvantages can be highlighted. The first of these would be that the use of non-recyclable plastic products are dangerous for the environment as plastic will create plethora of problems for the nature. According to one research, the index rate of soil pollution is increased by 4 times since two decades due to the use of plastic products. The second negative point is that the utilization of plastic boxes to store hot beverages and nutrition products leads to dangerous diseases such as Cancer.
To conclude, there are various merits of use of formable containers in daily life to carry foods and drinks, but it has numerous serious side effects on environment and people's life.
- The maps below show the changes that have been taken place in Meadowside village and Fonton a neighbouring town since 1962 49
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- THE BAR CHART BELOW SHOWS THE PERCENTAGE OF AUSTRALIAN MEN AND WOMEN IN DIFFERENT AGE GROUPS WHO DID REGULAR PHYSICAL ACITIVITY IN 2010 84
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 79
- Some parents believe that watching tv and playing computer games should be Limited and substituted by reading books Do you agree or disagree Give your opinion 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20740740741 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88343264417 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596296296296 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5842968438 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.428571429 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233079675693 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703657969647 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053519859873 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124138160657 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339888994023 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.