In many countries plastic shopping bags are the main source of rubbish, causing pollution on land and in the water, so people think they should be banned.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Needless to say, industrialization has led to several inventions like petrol, gas, plastic and so on which are boon for ease of people as well as Pandora box for healthy environment. In many parts of the world plastic bags are the major cause of garbage and leading to pollution of air, ocean and land, so many people argue to ban this monster which is killing Mother Nature. In my perspective, I stand on the same side of experts who shout for ban plastic.
One of the main causative factors to ban plastic is, it is non-degradable. The manufacturing of this material contains the composition of several chemicals like polyester, gas and coal which make the decomposition of this material near to impossible. It has been said that it will take 150 years to decompose a plastic bag which we generally use for shopping. Plastics can have an impact on the ecological cycle as it has a majority content of crude oil. This junk will be broken down into smaller piece which is also called as micro plastic and pollute the land masses, as a consequence the vegetation will be spoiled. Hence, it is imperative to avoid the use of plastic materials
Another factor to consider is, plastic will have a long-lasting negative impact on living beings. When it comes to binning plastic bags in ocean or in land fillings, most of the animals will consume them without knowledge. When these plastic junk is dumped in ocean it will be broken down into micro fragments and inhaled by many aquatic species, as a result there are many marine animals which have become extinct. BBC has published a video of a turtle with a plastic bag stuck to its body. This video revealed the extension of use of these materials.
By and large, plastic material is a threat not only to humans but also to environment as a whole. As this has already lead to devastating impact on all terrestrial living beings I will stand on a the view of eradicating the use of plastic and believe in sustainable development
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-23 | sriram012985 | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-22 | javaduddupudi | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-02 | smrm | 56 | view |
- Young people these days tend to be less polite and respectful than in the past Give the cause 85
- Many people support use of animals for testing medicines for humans. Others believe it isn’t appropriate to use animals for such experiments. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem? 61
- Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food. Others, however, think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Nowadays, many people are trying to make themselves look younger than they really are.What are the reasons for this, it is a positive or negative development? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 682, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve to avoid the use of plastic materials Another factor to consider is, plastic w...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
...ronment as a whole. As this has already lead to devastating impact on all terrestria...
^^^^
Line 9, column 195, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...rrestrial living beings I will stand on a the view of eradicating the use of plastic ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, well, as a result, as well as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71551724138 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75099971019 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528735632184 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2979210255 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176756568747 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625648353167 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497876812 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112301816053 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399618823966 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.