In many countries the proportion of older people is steadily increasing. Some think this is good, while others believe this is a problem for a country. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Increasing the number of elderly people portion has been a controversial topic these days among many territories around the globe. Although supporters would argue that it has many benefits for societies but refuters believe that this could impose dreadful impacts on countries’ economic. These two points of view will be analyzed deeply in this essay.
Firstly, the vast majority of supporters believe that aged citizens and their experience would have enormous impact on communities where they reside. For instance, it has been proved that youngsters who live with their grandparents are likely to become considerably successful in foreseeable future. These highly seasoned people would share their invaluable experiences, either with their loved ones or with community’s members. This approach could consequently discourage crimes between young adults in many urban cities. In addition to this, authorities could consider employing these valuable citizens in order to gain from their experiences which could lead to an economic boost for that country.
Secondly, the refuters of longevity would argue that the percentage of aging population has been severely raised which could have inevitable impact on economic systems in terms of aged care funding. In china, the government has enacted a law which would assist citizens with no children by providing subsidized funds to prevent swelling of aged population. As the above example indicates, longevity could exhaust the government’s resources because in many developed countries, governments have organized many programs for elderly people over 60s, to cover most of their health care expenses. Admittedly, increasing the life span could have detrimental impact on government’s resources which, instead, could be spent on highly substantial matters.
To conclude, the rapid growth of longevity in most modernized countries has introduced many supporters and refuters. Most of them believe that aged people are beneficial for their communities because of their adequate experiences, while others argue that these individuals impose significant amount of funds to be expensed for them. Thus, I feel that longevity would cause economic instability which eventually could have destructive impacts on societies as a whole.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-27 | Shweta406 | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | ahmedarbani | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-29 | ahmedarbani | 61 | view |
| 2018-11-03 | drtruong92 | 84 | view |
| 2018-10-30 | Ata1986g | 84 | view |
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Agree or disagree? 67
- You work for an international company. You have seen an advertisement for a training course which will be useful for your job.Write a letter to your manager. In your letter:Describe the training course you want to doExplain what the company could do to he 84
- You are planning to visit a foreign country Write a letter to your friends and say Where and when do you plan to go What are the details of your plan Why do you want them to go with you 91
- Smart devices have put all of the world s information at our fingertips The benefits of this development are obvious but what are the drawbacks 89
- Cutting down forests is a real environmental threat; yet, this is still happening at a great rate around the world. Why do you think forests are being destroyed? Are there any benefits from the destruction of forests? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, i feel, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78761061947 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9936919378 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569321533923 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4754592334 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.8 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141189603568 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544797771258 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482787125505 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105310579682 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526311397509 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.