Many historical sites and museums are mainly visited by tourists, not local people.
Why is this the case?
What can be done to attract local people to visit these historical sites and museums?
The main visitors of a heritage site or a museum are always tourists and seldom residents. This essay will discuss why this is happening and suggest relevant solutions to encourage locals for such visits.
It is obvious that historical sites are often considered mundane and time-consuming places. Specifically, the galleries comprise old insignificant pieces of art and history. The people residing in its vicinity are very well aware of the associated facts and myths. As a result, they avoid going to these places. Another factor to consider is a walk in a museum takes up a lot of time. Generally, local residents see tourism as a source of income. So they are not concerned about visiting the same place again and again. Instead, they would cater to the need of tourists so that they could earn some money.
On the basis of the above reasoning, comprehensive solutions are considered. The first solution is reinforcing the rule to allow free entry for locals to visit these places. For instance, at Sun Temple, the entry ticket is hefty for foreigners but nominal for Indians. It has drastically increased the number of visitors in the past few years. Another solution is educating the general public. Specifically, it is time for the government to generate awareness among people to know their heritage places. The community should promote the significance of their cultural sites. These measures will significantly promulgate the importance of such places.
In conclusion, there are various reasons for fewer visits to museums and historical sites. Nevertheless, I firmly believe that mandating a small entry fee and raising awareness concerning the importance of these sites must be taken to tackle the situation.
- Some people think that developed countries have a higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities towards protecting the environment Discuss both these views 78
- In some countries people of all age groups are engaging in too many sports or over exercising Are there more advantages or drawbacks to this development 78
- Recently abortion increases rapidly and becomes a controversial topic Some people suppose that abortion should be legal while others are against it Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Should the international community do more to tackle the threat of global warming Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 78
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person s culture and character from their choice of clothes Do you agree or disagree 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ears. Another solution is educating the general public. Specifically, it is time for the gover...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18996415771 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87601746714 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8464786237 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.4 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.95 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258793839358 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628024836004 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634166255214 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163632818106 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589578380481 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ears. Another solution is educating the general public. Specifically, it is time for the gover...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18996415771 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87601746714 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609318996416 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8464786237 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.4 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.95 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258793839358 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628024836004 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634166255214 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163632818106 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589578380481 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.23 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.